IMPD officers begin responding to shots fired calls using gunshot detection technology

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,984
    113
    I was very skeptical. I am now somewhat less skeptical but not fully onboard. It has potential to be a useful tool, primarily in recovering physical evidence like shell casings, post shooting. If the cost is worth it or not, I don't know. This is a test phase and we'll see where the data takes us.
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    25,211
    150
    Avon
    I was very skeptical. I am now somewhat less skeptical but not fully onboard. It has potential to be a useful tool, primarily in recovering physical evidence like shell casings, post shooting. If the cost is worth it or not, I don't know. This is a test phase and we'll see where the data takes us.
    Now I'm wanting to do a cost-benefit analysis. Not like the ones I do at work, this would be for fun!
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,519
    149
    1,000 yards out
    Asking for a friend:

    When seconds matter and police are minutes away, will "detected" rounds delivered in defense change that math?

    If so, how?
     

    Bigtanker

    Cuddles
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Aug 21, 2012
    21,688
    151
    Osceola
    South Bend has had this for several years. Has it helped some? I do believe so. How much I don't know. I remember seeing news reports of "Shot Spotter alerted the police about 7 shots at xxxxxxx address. Police showed up and found a man bleeding."

    But some folks up here were really jaded about it.

    When the previous, new chief came to town, he pushed for it right away. After a year or so, it was put in. A few years after that, the chief retired and went to work for the company that made and installed the system.
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    25,211
    150
    Avon
    But some folks up here were really jaded about it.

    When the previous, new chief came to town, he pushed for it right away. After a year or so, it was put in. A few years after that, the chief retired and went to work for the company that made and installed the system.
    I bet he got a good bonus for that, too!
    That will make one jaded. Shot Spotter sounds like a defense contractor.
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    25,211
    150
    Avon
    I was very skeptical. I am now somewhat less skeptical but not fully onboard. It has potential to be a useful tool, primarily in recovering physical evidence like shell casings, post shooting. If the cost is worth it or not, I don't know. This is a test phase and we'll see where the data takes us.
    How do they quantify success? Response times decreased by XX% seems like an easy stat to look at, but does that give an accurate picture.

    Seems like a decrease in "total time on call" (T-TOC, I just made that up) would be a good metric. The more time officers are in the area... no too much variation.

    If anyone uses buzz words like "proprietary algorithms", the system will get a result that will be used to claim success. As the pointy-haired boss from Dilbert once said, "we're doing much better since we redefined success as a slowing of failure."

    Does it get the good guys with guns to the scene of the bad guys with guns quicker and more accurately? I'd call that a success. Now measuring that and determining a cost benefit? Hhhhmmmmm. Higher arrest percentage? Now we're talking! If only "revolving door Ryan" would get voted out... seems like he wants to run for a different office.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    51,114
    113
    Mitchell
    I guess this is one way to automate police work. I’m assuming PDs everywhere are still having a hard time retaining and hiring officers. In industry when labor becomes too expensive (or you just can’t get it, I suppose) they figure out ways to do the job with less of it. I’m guessing this is a way to do the work with fewer officers.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    37,027
    113
    .
    I would imagine cities will see a lot more vendors with new tech in the future. It all depends on how much value the new tech brings for the cost against how many live officers the city could hire for the same money. That is, if the city can hire live officers. Robocop is still a ways off.
     
    Top Bottom