If you had to apply for the absentee ballot in person for a compelling reason (not because you feel like it) with ID and signatures were required to match if you claim not to have received the ballot but it was turned in and the problem should be solved.Voting in person should require an ID, voting absentee, perhaps notarized....
Unlikely that it is a search skills problem, search results have been manipulated for a while.I heard it 2nd hand that in Philadelphia that certain districts had more votes than registered voters. I tried to find something online that states that but can't. Is this just conspiracy talk or is there truth in this and my search skills stink?
And as I understand it, you dont convene a specific convention. Once the convention is enacted, folks can pile on whatever they want. So it can be started for say congressional term limits, but some a**hat can suggest another amendment that would repeal the 2nd amendment because it is outdated.
So be careful what you wish for. (feel free to correctme if I am wrong, I wont be offended)
Now is not the time for sure. As far as my feelings the procedure for amending the Constitution is just fine as it is. It is supposed to difficult to do. Jim.^^^^
THIS
A Con-Con opens the door for ANYTHING to be altered to the Constitution. And I can guarantee that there would be BIG push to alter the 2nd Amendment.
Never happen. With states doing it their way, you have many different systems, which causes confusion nationally. The enemy is the author of confusion.There should be federal rules for elections. We need to get this into congress right now. The sooner this becomes a topic of conversation, the sooner we get somewhere on it.
Every vote must be authenticated, period.
No more national election stealing from a few "swing states."
We could very well be one election away from never winning again.
The dems have been working on that for years. Their whole mantra of voter ID suppressing the minority vote is based on it. The 'rona brought the dems the perfect storm of exploitation and they did it right in front of our faces.Never happen. With states doing it their way, you have many different systems, which causes confusion nationally. The enemy is the author of confusion.
It does become open to propose anything but each new amendment proposed also has to be ratified through the standard ratification by 3/4 of thd states, so it isnt like they can just junk the Constitution.And as I understand it, you dont convene a specific convention. Once the convention is enacted, folks can pile on whatever they want. So it can be started for say congressional term limits, but some a**hat can suggest another amendment that would repeal the 2nd amendment because it is outdated.
So be careful what you wish for. (feel free to correctme if I am wrong, I wont be offended)
In today's bat crazy woke political environment, I do not trust political activist mounting a unprecedented attack against the 2nd, and you know it would be number one on their agenda.It does become open to propose anything but each new amendment proposed also has to be ratified through the standard ratification by 3/4 of thd states, so it isn't like they can just junk the Constitution.
I didn't say I think it would be a good idea, just that it wouldn't be an open-ended free for all.In today's bat crazy woke political environment, I do not trust political activist mounting a unprecedented attack against the 2nd, and you know it would be number one on their agenda.
Maricopa County Admits To Withholding Routers Demanded In Senate Subpoena
Maricopa County officials have not fully complied with the State Senate’s election audit subpoenas, a decision made to avoid causing a “significant security risk” to data utilized by numerous law enforcement agencies, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office said Monday. “We had previously believed...arizonadailyindependent.com