Why Did They Have To Steal The Election?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,854
    113
    North Central
    Why did they have to steal the election? Why not run a fair election and beat them next time? I have a few ideas why they had to steal this particular election.

    Those pushing us to world government were getting off schedule.

    The public was seeing resurgence in manufacturing and jobs, that the economy was growing and that growth was strengthening America, that we were decreasing pollution more than others even though we left the Paris accord. An awakening of sorts...

    Black and Hispanic voters were increasingly positive to conservative political candidates.

    The Democratic Party would only have about 20 senators total if the Black vote was 50-50. That Trump in particular was reaching out to them and actually doing things to make their lives better was something the democrats could not have happen. If one looks at election data and excludes the cities with alleged vote fraud, DJT achieved a vote total that is unprecedented in modern times. If they allowed that to continue they may have been out of power for a long time. Trump also grew the Hispanic vote as well. Again, an awakening of sorts.

    The corruption was about to break the dam.

    A little of the corruption of the Obama team has come out, (not covered by MSM) but it has just been covered up, not covered. We are talking things that make Watergate look like childs play. They used all their deep state to keep this as tamped down as possible for the years Trump was there but they would be against the odds trying that for another 4 years.

    They had to affect the steal or the democratic party may well have imploded...
     

    Shooter5

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jun 19, 2008
    163
    43
    Indiana
    No question that this election was stolen...so many data points. I’m shocked that the SCOTUS did not take a look. So many states had more votes than actual registered voters...that alone should be looked at.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,863
    113
    .
    My own opinion is that he would have lost in 2016 if the machine had thought he would beat Clinton. It was ready for him this time, world control has no tolerance or use for populists.

    That said I don't think we'll see him as a candidate in 2024, if you can steal an election, how hard is a primary?
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    The election wasn’t stolen, or at the very least, you can’t prove it was stolen, making any definitive statement about it moot.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    My own opinion is that he would have lost in 2016 if the machine had thought he would beat Clinton. It was ready for him this time, world control has no tolerance or use for populists.

    That said I don't think we'll see him as a candidate in 2024, if you can steal an election, how hard is a primary?
    Trump won’t run in ‘24. I was reluctant to vote for Biden because of his age, and hope he’s primaried. Trump will be 80 in ‘24. 80. No way that’s a good bet for voters. But like I said he won’t run. He’s just teasing you to keep his supporters eating from his hand.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    103,573
    149
    Southside Indy
    Ok, that also further proves that there’s no definitive proof the election was stolen.
    How so? Because the courts said, "no standing" and refused to even hear cases? Or because Congress refused to investigate? Christ, Congress investigated steroid use in MLB for crying out loud. How in the hell is that even remotely Congress' responsibility?
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    How so? Because the courts said, "no standing" and refused to even hear cases? Or because Congress refused to investigate? Christ, Congress investigated steroid use in MLB for crying out loud. How in the hell is that even remotely Congress' responsibility?
    Well typically, you don’t investigate things you know to be fact.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Ok, that also further proves that there’s no definitive proof the election was stolen.
    We know. Votes added at speeds several times the mechanical limits of the tabulating machines, voter turnout exceeding 100%, denying observers whose traditional role had been watching ballots for stray marks indicating the voter had voted "correctly" as paid were not allowed within eyesight of the counting, and rules changed by parties not legally authorized to do so dont mean jack ****.
     
    Top Bottom