MickeyBlueEyes
Sharpshooter
Protecting your property from trespass with deadly force is not justifiable. You can use deadly force to protect from a forcible felony: yourself; others; dwellings or cars that are "reasonably assumed to be occupied" (I can't recall ICC off the top of my head, but I'm sure Bill of Rights will soon).
Protecting your property does not extend to firing blindly into the thicket.
I also want to know how you confuse car doors slamming and people talking for a coyote attack.
A lot does NOT add up here. At the very least, negligent homicide charges should be filed. At worst, aggravated assault and murder in the first degree (I would vote to acquit on those charges, but vote to convict on Negligent Homicide).
Why is it, that every body is trying to give the people that were on the property with permission a pass. The dad was negligent when he entered another person's property without notice. The property owner didn't violate any law by firing blindly into his own property. There is no law on the books about that. Negligent discharge of a firearm is from your property causing damage to someone elses property.
If you got shot on my property, you must have been trespassing. I'm a Corrections Officer and I am always in fear for my life and the lives of my family.
If you are here on my land, you must have called me, or told me that you were coming out here. Period.
Negligent Homicide is pushing it. There was Negligence all the way around and the only person paying for it was a 17 year old son of the Negligent permissed trespasser.