Pass on the LC9 and get an LC9s.
Or if you don't want a safety and mag disconnect, the LC9s Pro.
The S stands for striker fired and IMHO they are a much better trigger than the initial LC9 model.
My LC9s Pro gets carried often.
Pass on the LC9 and get an LC9s.
Or if you don't want a safety and mag disconnect, the LC9s Pro.
The S stands for striker fired and IMHO they are a much better trigger than the initial LC9 model.
My LC9s Pro gets carried often.
I have the LC9S and I'm very happy with it. The tiny white dot sights are excellent and the trigger is light years better than a double action pull. The gun is very light and as such, recoil is very snappy but it's a blast to shoot. I shoot it better than my SR9C.^Hornett nailed it. Skip the LC9 and look for one of it's two direct descendants.
Pass on the LC9 and get an LC9s.
Or if you don't want a safety and mag disconnect, the LC9s Pro.
The S stands for striker fired and IMHO they are a much better trigger than the initial LC9 model.
My LC9s Pro gets carried often.
totally agree / or consider the S&W Shield in 9mm
This being said, I only have one knock on it: It seems every range trip I am shooting it and hit the mag release at least once which renders it unfireable due to the mag disconnect feature. This is why I will not carry one, but this is just my experience FWIW.