HR 1004

[brentlacy]

Seems Andre Carson (D - IN) is throwing his weight behind a scheme to require proof of insurance to purchase a firearm.
What could go wrong?

Below The Radar – HR 1004 Require Liability Insurance Coverage to Purchase Firearms

Carolyn Maloney wants to add more hassle to exercising your Second Amendment rights.

www.ammoland.com

 

[cbhausen]

**** him

 

[indykid]

With "reps" like Carson, we should demand that politicians have insurance before they try to pass any unconstitutional laws. Or any laws for that matter>

 

[Whisk604]

I would start with treason personally. Taking an oath to defend and uphold the constitution then trying to change it. Making insurance mandatory just gives them the opportunity to buy another company and become rich off of our misery.

 

[Bennettjh]

I despise the fact he's from Indiana. There are worse politicians in America but geez.

 

[chevyguy]

I would start with treason personally. Taking an oath to defend and uphold the constitution then trying to change it. Making insurance mandatory just gives them the opportunity to buy another company and become rich off of our misery.

Maybe he has a family member in the insurance industry needing more money thats generally how it works

 

[Whisk604]

Maybe he has a family member in the insurance industry needing more money thats generally how it works

It kills me that insider trading is legal for them. Two tier doesn't work for me

 

[chevyguy]

It kills me that insider trading is legal for them. Two tier doesn't work for me

Well to be fair I didn’t say it as a matter of fact, just saying that things like that are known to happen

 

[Whisk604]

Well to be fair I didn’t say it as a matter of fact, just saying that things like that are known to happen

I am saying that. They made it legal for themselves years ago as well as lying has no consequence. I'll try to find a link. It was during Obama if I remember correctly.

 

[Whisk604]

They passed the Stock Act in 2012 allowing congress to prosecute another member for insider trading. There is not a law allowing them to do it legally but depending on who you know there is no consequence either. While searching I learned that they started using blind trusts to hide what they buy from public eyes.