Brady and Black Powder

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Citizen 5

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    43
    8
    Warsaw
    A relative of mine had pretty rough spot in his life a few years ago, and got himself snagged on two or three Brady Bull restrictions. (not felony)

    I've heard people say that "prohibited persons" can have black powder guns, but the bill references 18 U.S.C. § 921 (a)(3) for its definition of a firearm, and that calls a firearm

    (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive

    Ok, so that sounds like it would include black powder guns... but there seems to be an exception made for "antique" guns.

    (C) any muzzle loading rifle, muzzle loading shotgun, or muzzle
    loading pistol, which is designed to use black powder, or a black
    powder substitute, and which cannot use fixed ammunition. For
    purposes of this subparagraph, the term "antique firearm" shall
    not include any weapon which incorporates a firearm frame or
    receiver, any firearm which is converted into a muzzle loading
    weapon, or any muzzle loading weapon which can be readily
    converted to fire fixed ammunition by replacing the barrel, bolt,
    breechblock, or any combination thereof.

    Does this apply to black powder revolvers? He only has one arm, so a hand gun would likely be better for him than a muzzle-loading long gun. Any insights from those more knowledgeable than me?
     
    Last edited:

    Citizen 5

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    43
    8
    Warsaw
    Sorry... "Brady Bull" (instead of "Brady Bill") was supposed to be a play on words. As far as restrictions:

    From Wikipedia:
    Section 922(g) of the Brady Act prohibits certain persons from shipping or transporting any firearm in interstate or foreign commerce, or receiving any firearm which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, or possessing any firearm in or affecting commerce. These prohibitions apply to any person who:

    1. Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
    2. Is a fugitive from justice;
    3. Is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance;
    4. Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution;
    5. Is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
    6. Has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
    7. Having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced U.S. citizenship;
    8. Is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner, or;
    9. Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
    10. Has a record of being a felon.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,083
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Those are not restrictions of the Brady Bill but the GCA of 1968. The Brady Bill is alleged to look for those restrictions.

    Sorry, I was confused thinking you might think the Brady Bill imposed additional restrictions. The Brady Bill is an empty glass, like Castle Doctrine, that shooters use to describe the SSA, the GCA, the NFA, the AWB, the Lautenberg Act, inter alia.
     

    kludge

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Mar 13, 2008
    5,360
    48
    Hmmm... a black powder revolver is not a "muzzleloading" pistol the way I see it.

    ...and a lot of them can be "readily converted to fire fixed ammunition".

    Gonna go with "no" on this one.
     

    Citizen 5

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    43
    8
    Warsaw
    Cit5, can you tell us what kind of prohibited person he is?

    The answer, as always (darn lawyers), depends.

    #1 for DUI (Sentence was minimal, but could have been up to 1 yr. locked up)
    #3 Did use, doesn't anymore. Never arrested for it.
    #4 I don't know if it applies, but spent a few days in a Bowen center.
    #8 Had a restraining order from (now ex-) wife, I don't believe it is still in effect.
     

    samwathegreat

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 22, 2009
    109
    16
    Sounds to me like none of these offenses would prevent him from legally owning an actual firearm.... IANAL, so I would advise checking with one to be sure.
     

    Citizen 5

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    43
    8
    Warsaw
    I'm not sure... I just know that he received some court documentation a while back that, among other things, mentioned that he was prohibited from owning firearms due to the Brady Act. I'll talk to him about it next time I see him--maybe it's something like you mentioned and it was only active during probation. If so, sweet!

    If not, and he's still a prohibited person, any info on what he can have?

    P.S. Thanks for all the info so far!
     

    JoshuaW

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Jun 18, 2010
    2,266
    38
    South Bend, IN
    Out of curiosity, is there a way for a potentially restricted person to find out if they are actually restricted, preferably from the justice system in some way? My first inclination was to say attempt a purchase and see if NICS kicked it back, but the reality of it is NICS is not 100% reliable, and if someone who was interested in following the law got a green light, but was actually supposed to be restricted, they could end up in a lot of a trouble, despite trying to follow the law.
     

    mike4sigs

    Master
    Rating - 94.4%
    34   2   0
    Jan 24, 2009
    1,533
    99
    Southern Adams County
    ?? not sure what the bowen center is but if it a some sort of mental rehab center and it is documented he might be restricted !
    and you ?? said something about a restraining order ! the judge could have ordered no firearms during this time!
    but if i was him i would check it out ! some how thru the judical system !
    good luck to him!
     

    justjoe

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 24, 2011
    248
    16
    gun counter at walmart
    if bowen center was court ordered or if restraining order is still in effect he is disqualified

    bowen: form 4473 question f

    domestic violence restraining order: form 4473 question h
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    526,562
    Messages
    9,844,828
    Members
    54,074
    Latest member
    rickyjohnson111
    Top Bottom