Breonna Taylor investigation announcement today, Wed 23 Sept @ 1330

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ramyankee42

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Apr 28, 2020
    52
    8
    Indianapolis
    Changing it from a knock and announce to a no knock was probably what killed her. If they had served an actual no knock they would have actually been in bed, like the media said they were even though they weren't, they were in the hallway. Knock and announce got them up and moving to the front door...
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,300
    77
    Porter County
    This guy should be prosecuted.
    Jaynes was not at the scene the night of the shooting but sought the warrant that sent police to Taylor’s home. Gentry said Jaynes lied about how he obtained some information about Taylor in the warrant.

    An internal investigation by Louisville police found Jaynes violated department procedures for preparation of a search warrant and truthfulness. Jaynes acknowledged in a May interview with Louisville police investigators that he didn’t personally verify that a drug trafficking suspect, Jamarcus Glover, was receiving mail at Taylor’s apartment, even though he had said in an earlier affidavit that he had. Jaynes said he relied instead on information from a fellow officer.
     

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    94   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    38,183
    113
    Btown Rural

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,300
    77
    Porter County
    I don't have a problem with this.

    "Specifically, we allege that Ms. Taylor’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated when defendants Joshua Jaynes, Kyle Meany and Kelly Goodlett sought a warrant to search Ms. Taylor’s home knowing that the officers lacked probable cause for the search," he added.

    If they can prove this case in court, the officers should be held accountable.
     

    Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    6,855
    113
    Indy

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,788
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I don't have a problem with this.



    If they can prove this case in court, the officers should be held accountable.
    Yes. If they prove their case, the rule of law should prevail.

    I think the outrage is more about the perceived imbalance of enforcement by the DOJ. While I wouldn't classify this as an example of "weaponizing the DOJ" I think it is an example of apparent imbalance. It looks like some animals are more equal than other animals.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,300
    77
    Porter County
    Yes. If they prove their case, the rule of law should prevail.

    I think the outrage is more about the perceived imbalance of enforcement by the DOJ. While I wouldn't classify this as an example of "weaponizing the DOJ" I think it is an example of apparent imbalance. It looks like some animals are more equal than other animals.
    True. In the article it stated that the officer falsified information for the warrant and was fired, but apparently not prosecuted.
    Jaynes was fired from the Louisville Police Department in January 2021 after his supervisors said he lied on paperwork that lead to the March 2020 raid on Taylor’s apartment, during which she was killed.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,265
    149
    Columbus, OH
    I find this difficult to comprehend. Was it something to do with timeline/recency of information used? At the time this was a hot topic, there existed excerpts from surveillance of Taylor driving her (at the time) boyfriend around to his drug safe houses and it was known that she allowed her address to be used by him to receive shipments

    The only flaw in the process would seem to be the police not checking her relationship status on Facetube before serving the warrant. That she may have decided former boyfriend was bringing too much heat in no way made it LESS likely that former boyfriend was hiding there from the sweep of his 'business' locations nor that evidence of his drug dealing might be available there

    What would have happened to anyone SWATted by the Jan 6th committee if their boyfriend fired on police during the raid? Live by the sword ...
     

    wtburnette

    WT(aF)
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    45   0   0
    Nov 11, 2013
    27,055
    113
    SW side of Indy
    I find this difficult to comprehend. Was it something to do with timeline/recency of information used? At the time this was a hot topic, there existed excerpts from surveillance of Taylor driving her (at the time) boyfriend around to his drug safe houses and it was known that she allowed her address to be used by him to receive shipments

    The only flaw in the process would seem to be the police not checking her relationship status on Facetube before serving the warrant. That she may have decided former boyfriend was bringing too much heat in no way made it LESS likely that former boyfriend was hiding there from the sweep of his 'business' locations nor that evidence of his drug dealing might be available there

    What would have happened to anyone SWATted by the Jan 6th committee if their boyfriend fired on police during the raid? Live by the sword ...

    Exactly. This is exactly the information I've read or heard about and don't understand all the venom spewed about this situation, except possibly people believing the misinformation the Left has put out about this case.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,300
    77
    Porter County
    But this week, federal prosecutors said Detective Jaynes had lied. It was never clear whether the former boyfriend was receiving packages at Ms. Taylor’s home. And Mr. Jaynes, the prosecutors said, had never confirmed as much with any postal inspector. As outrage over Ms. Taylor’s death grew, prosecutors said in new criminal charges filed in federal court, Mr. Jaynes met with another detective in his garage and agreed on a story to tell the F.B.I. and their own colleagues to cover up the false and misleading statements the police had made to justify the raid.
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,300
    77
    Porter County
    Exactly. This is exactly the information I've read or heard about and don't understand all the venom spewed about this situation, except possibly people believing the misinformation the Left has put out about this case.
    You don't understand venom over officers lying to get a warrant to no-knock someone's home? Even without the death, I do. This just adds someone getting killed because of it.
     

    DragonGunner

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 14, 2010
    5,578
    113
    N. Central IN
    I remember when this story broke....so much information, so much disinformation......it seems it just continues on and on. How is one able to decide on a matter when so much is hidden, lied about....and it always seems to take so long before the truth comes out.....if it ever does....and when it does....is it really the truth?
     

    wtburnette

    WT(aF)
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    45   0   0
    Nov 11, 2013
    27,055
    113
    SW side of Indy
    You don't understand venom over officers lying to get a warrant to no-knock someone's home? Even without the death, I do. This just adds someone getting killed because of it.
    What I heard is different than what the feds are saying now. Not to mention, while a no-knock warrant was used, I had heard they announced anyway, negating the fact that it was a no knock warrant. At the time, most info I heard was that it was known that the location was known to be used for dropoffs for drugs and that she was aware of it. If it's true that this wasn't the case and the officers knew this, then yes it should be followed up on.

    Do I believe pretty much anything from the federal government at this point in time? Nope.
     
    Top Bottom