Vaccine coercion/bribery

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,243
    113
    Merrillville
    217230863_10226635486419165_2793223291482556363_n.jpg
     

    BE Mike

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    Jul 23, 2008
    7,551
    113
    New Albany
    so since you didn’t actually read the article I’ll quote the relevant portion.

    tldr: Viral RNA can potentially in a lab setting be reverse transcribed into human DNA.

    this is groundbreaking research that while is not absolute proof that the vaccine MRNA is changing DNA it is proof that the idea and possibly should not simply be dismissed as “not possible”
    Significance
    An unresolved issue of SARS-CoV-2 disease is that patients often remain positive for viral RNA as detected by PCR many weeks after the initial infection in the absence of evidence for viral replication. We show here that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of the in- fected cell and be expressed as chimeric transcripts fusing viral with cellular sequences. Importantly, such chimeric transcripts are detected in patient-derived tissues. Our data suggest that, in some patient tissues, the majority of all viral transcripts are derived from integrated sequences. Our data provide an in- sight into the consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infections that may help to explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery.
    I have a BS degree and am fluent in one language and have a working knowledge of a second, but I'll be darned if I can make heads or tails of this.
     

    Mr. Habib

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 4, 2009
    3,785
    149
    Somewhere else
    :scratch:

    Let me tell you what Big Pharma does. It invents things like chemo tharapy to treat cancer. That's awesome. It sometimes works. And gives people hope. But it has a lot of side effects that are really, really, really bad. So then along comes little pharma, to invent a new drug that drastically reduces the dosage of chemo necessary to kill some common types of cancer cells. That's great because then, side effects from the chemo aren't nearly as bad. It also allows some people who would not have been able to take the chemo otherwise, to be able to take it.

    But guess what? Big pharma WANTS to sell a lot of chemo. Because it's really expensive. And they make a lot of money. How they gonna make they dollars if some deranged small company goes and makes a little chemo go a long way? So they've been lobbying the FDA to drag their feet on approvals.

    Big pharma will **** you in the *** for pennies because even pennies in profit is profit. The crap that needs knocked off is the big pharma phallus admiration. Big pharma does a lot of good, but not out of the goodness of their hearts. And I'm not saying there's anything wrong with making a buck on one's products. They're not your friends though. Well. Maybe they're YOUR friends, I dunno. Maybe you work for Big Pharma. That's all well and good. But they're not in business to be benevolent. They've been caught many times ****ing the public, like many big corps.
    I work for big pharma. You don't know how right you are.
     

    tbhausen

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    83   0   0
    Feb 12, 2010
    4,933
    113
    West Central IN
    Copied this off Facebook, thought it was at least interesting:


    Its YOUR BODY- YOUR CHOICE.

    But....
    As for the poke!!! Make it make sense!

    ME: CDC, should I get poke if I already had Covid?

    CDC: “Yes, you should be poked regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19.”

    ME: Oh, okay, we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts. Got it. So, how long does poke-induced immunity last?

    CDC: “There is still a lot we are learning about COVID-19 pokes and CDC is constantly reviewing evidence and updating guidance. We don’t know how long protection lasts for those who are poked.”

    ME: Okay … but wait a second. I thought you said the reason I need the poke was because we don’t know how long my natural immunity lasts, but it seems like you’re saying we ALSO don’t know how long poke immunity lasts either. So, how exactly is the poke immunity better than my natural immunity?

    CDC: …

    ME: Uh … alright. But, haven’t there been a bunch of studies suggesting that natural immunity could last for years or decades?

    CDC: Yes.

    NEW YORK TIMES: “Years, maybe even decades, according to a new study.”

    ME: Ah. So natural immunity might last longer than poke immunity?

    CDC: Possibly. You never know.

    ME: Okay. If I get the poke, does that mean I won’t get sick?

    BRITAIN: Nope. We are just now entering a seasonal spike and about half of our infections and hospital admissions are poked people.

    ME: CDC, is this true? Are there a lot of people in the U.S. catching COVID after getting the poke?

    CDC: We stopped tracking breakthrough cases. We accept voluntary reports of breakthroughs but aren’t out there looking for them.

    ME: Does that mean that if someone comes in the hospital with COVID, you don’t track them because they’ve been poked? You only track the UN-poked COVID cases?

    CDC: That’s right.

    ME: Oh, okay. Hmm. Well, if I can still get sick after I get the poke, how is it helping me?

    CDC: We never said you wouldn’t get sick. We said it would reduce your chances of serious illness or death.

    ME: Oh, sorry. Alright, exactly how much does it reduce my chance of serious illness or death.

    CDC: We don’t know “exactly.”

    ME: Oh. Then what’s your best estimate for how much risk reduction there is?

    CDC: We don’t know, okay? Next question.

    ME: Um, if I’m healthy and don’t want the poke, is there any reason I should get it?

    CDC: Yes, for the collective.

    ME: How does the collective benefit from me getting poked?

    CDC: Because you could spread the virus to someone else who might get sick and die.

    ME: Can a poked person spread the virus to someone else?

    CDC: Yes.

    ME: So if I get poked, I could still spread the virus to someone else?

    CDC: Yes.

    ME: But I thought you just said, the REASON I should get poked was to prevent me spreading the virus? How does that make sense if I can still catch COVID and spread it after getting the poke?

    CDC: Never mind that. The other thing is, if you stay unpoked, there’s a chance the virus could possibly mutate into a strain that escapes the pokes protection, putting all poked people at risk.

    ME: So the poke stops the virus from mutating?

    CDC: No.

    ME: So it can still mutate in poked people?

    CDC: Yes.

    ME: This seems confusing. If the poke doesn’t stop mutations, and it doesn’t stop infections, then how does me getting poked help prevent a more deadly strain from evolving to escape the poke?

    CDC: You aren’t listening, okay? The bottom line is: as long as you are unpoked, you pose a threat to poked people.

    ME: But what KIND of threat??

    CDC: The threat that they could get a serious case of COVID and possibly die.

    ME: My brain hurts. Didn’t you JUST say that the poke doesn’t keep people from catching COVID, but prevents a serious case or dying? Now it seems like you’re saying poked people can still easily die from COVID even after they got the poke just by running into an unpoked person! Which is it??

    CDC: That’s it, we’re hanging up now.

    ME: Wait! I just want to make sure I understand all this. So, even if I ALREADY had COVID, I should STILL get poked, because we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts, and we also don’t know how long poke immunity lasts. And I should get the poke to keep a poked person from catching COVID from me, but even if I get the poke, I can give it to the poked person anyways. And, the other poked person can still easily catch a serious case of COVID from me and die. Do I have all that right…….

    ME: Um, hello? Is anyone there!?...
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom