I didn't think you could express yourself. Today's a double header.
When AT&T spun off Lucent Technologies in the mid-90s, we went from a company employing 250,000+ to one that had 30,000. But we inherited all of the 100,000 retired Western Electric employees and their benefits. The decision was made that pensions would now only be offered on a sliding scale based on years of employment, with the cutoff service number for the minimum pension to be 15 years. This decision was made as I began my 14th year of employment. It did/does suck, but I understand. But you should have heard the retired, mostly union employees scream when it was also announced that full, free medical insurance would no longer be provided for life to spouses of retired employees.It's 2023. What major corporations are still offering pensions?
Moving the goalposts?
You've posted plenty of times in this thread about how great unions are, but I was able to get you to post plenty of NON union corporations that still offer pensions...That wasn't you question. You lost.
You can quit looking for a Got ya.
I've worked in the trades for over 20 yrs, never seen anyone wipe **** on the wallsSounds like your average union employee. I've seen the "human waste" for myself in the bathrooms
It seems to happen all the time with those Union workers, I learned it here.I've worked in the trades for over 20 yrs, never seen anyone wipe **** on the walls
I love how we just go ****ing deepend here sometimes. No one is saying all union members are lazy worthless pieces of ****. There ARE worthless pieces of **** that are union, and non union. What most of us ARE saying is that a 40% increase in salary plus a 20% reduction in work hours is just not cool. Also not cool is shutting down repair shops and body shops from being able to repair existing vehicles because you want these unrealistic things.
Why would they continue to pay for coverage when they have no obligation to do so? Why not make the union cover it? After all, every union member is a lazy, worthless piece of ****. I learned it right here.
Somebody should inform the CEO's that we are all lazy, worthless pieces of **** and they should stop wasting money on us.
I agree they're demands are horse ****.I love how we just go ****ing deepend here sometimes. No one is saying all union members are lazy worthless pieces of ****. There ARE worthless pieces of **** that are union, and non union. What most of us ARE saying is that a 40% increase in salary plus a 20% reduction in work hours is just not cool. Also not cool is shutting down repair shops and body shops from being able to repair existing vehicles because you want these unrealistic things.
But don't let me ruin your pity party.
Look, I've seen my fair share of worthless UAW workers over the years. Just like I've seen it elsewhere. The issue to me is the worthless uaw worker gets much more protection from firing than the average duck and makes more money not doing anything (hence the worthless moniker those people earn). We have some UAW people here telling us that there are no worthless people just like you have some that think most are. The answer is in the middle somewhere if you're willing to look.I agree they're demands are horse ****.
Just get tired of all the ******** about union guys being lazy or supporting the Dems.
I the trades if you're a lazy piece of **** we get rid of you . And it might surprise most people, but 98% of the union guys I know are conservatives.
And let's not forget our dues support the Dems, you have to sign up for political donations
that's great... but what about the offers they've gotten and rejected with the reply "they won't return until all demands are met?" That doesn't seem like negotiating. That seems like holding hostage.I also agree that the uaw offer is horse ****, but isn't that part of negotiations? When I bought my house, it was a repo listed at $160,000. Can you believe I had the nerve to offer $40,000? I mean, how ridiculous of me to offer a low ball offer and not just shut up and pay their full asking! We ended up agreeing to $70,000 despite my ridiculous offer.
Not one single union member expects a 40% raise and every union member is still convinced the 32 hour week has to be a joke, but don't all negotiations start far apart and end up in the middle?
I work for a major Japanese Auto Manufacturer.I've worked in the trades for over 20 yrs, never seen anyone wipe **** on the walls
Apparently Ford offered 20%. I haven't heard of the UAW coming back with a counter offer. Sounds like it's "my way or the highway". Negotiating is fine if both parties participate in good faith. If not... well you have things like strikes.I also agree that the uaw offer is horse ****, but isn't that part of negotiations? When I bought my house, it was a repo listed at $160,000. Can you believe I had the nerve to offer $40,000? I mean, how ridiculous of me to offer a low ball offer and not just shut up and pay their full asking! We ended up agreeing to $70,000 despite my ridiculous offer.
Not one single union member expects a 40% raise and every union member is still convinced the 32 hour week has to be a joke, but don't all negotiations start far apart and end up in the middle?
Well, here's more to the story...Apparently Ford offered 20%. I haven't heard of the UAW coming back with a counter offer. Sounds like it's "my way or the highway". Negotiating is fine if both parties participate in good faith. If not... well you have things like strikes.
I didn't see the counter offer details other than to say that it was a "comprehensive proposal" (intentionally vague?), but I did notice the reference to EV production cutting their workforce. Which political party is pushing for EVs again? Why would they support a political party that is hell bent on cutting their jobs?Well, here's more to the story...
View attachment 303208
The highlighted part was a little dig at this...