Trump 2024 ???

[SheepDog4Life]

Carly Simon is a good reminder that crazy is an away game. Don't bring that **** home.

I'd go even further than that... don't even let crazy know where you live!

 

[SheepDog4Life]

“The singer also finally confirmed on Wednesday that ex-boyfriend Warren Beatty is one of the people she slams in her most famous song.”

“Ever since its release in November 1972, fans have been speculating who You're So Vain was written about and she told People that those who had guessed the 78-year-old actor were correct.”

Carly Simon reveals series of sexual encounters at age 7 with teen boy

Carly Simon, 70, revealed that she was involved in sexual encounters at age seven with a boy in his teens.

www.dailymail.co.uk

I have confirmed that the second verse is Warren,' she revealed.

When asked if he knew, she of course replied: 'Warren thinks the whole thing is about him!'

The singer said the No. 1 hit is about three men - including Beatty - though she isn't naming the others.

She said she doesn't think she'll ever reveal who verses one and three refer to, or 'at least until they know it's about them.

Apparently, the other two are not vain enough to think the song is about them.

 

[MarylandTacomaRider]

Guys, you’ve seen the stats of Millenials and Gen Zers.

They vote overwhelmingly democrat.

Plus we’re importing millions of liberal voters from below the border.

Then there’s all the mail in ballots, harvesting, questionable counting/cheating in swing states.

Then you have Republicans fleeing blue and purple states for red states.

Any of those alone will likely mean we will never win another presidency in the foreseeable future.

Put them all together and I think the left has won.

Just being realistic.

Pat Buchanan was warning about this stuff decades ago!

 

[dshaf]

I certainly would vote for him if he would run and get the nomination. But I hope that he does not get the nomination because I don’t believe he can win the national election

 

[Route 45]

Donald Trump's call to "terminate" Constitution sparks fury

"Attacking the Constitution and all it stands for is anathema to the soul of our nation, and should be universally condemned," a White House spokesman said.

www.newsweek.com

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Donald Trump's call to "terminate" Constitution sparks fury

"Attacking the Constitution and all it stands for is anathema to the soul of our nation, and should be universally condemned," a White House spokesman said.

www.newsweek.com

That's not how I would interpret this:

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote in response to Elon Musk's "Twitter Files."

To me it sounds like Trump is saying that the fraud terminated the rules, regulations and articles.

 

[KLB]

That's not how I would interpret this:

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote in response to Elon Musk's "Twitter Files."

To me it sounds like Trump is saying that the fraud terminated the rules, regulations and articles.

Not when you read the whole post.

Throwing out election results or having a new election.

 

[Route 45]

That's not how I would interpret this:

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," Trump wrote in response to Elon Musk's "Twitter Files."

To me it sounds like Trump is saying that the fraud terminated the rules, regulations and articles.

That's why I posted the story and the actual post. Gonna be a lot of spin both ways. Knowing Trump's ego, though, I think he's probably saying what most people think he's saying.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Not when you read the whole post.

Throwing out election results or having a new election.

That's why I posted the story and the actual post. Gonna be a lot of spin both ways. Knowing Trump's ego, though, I think he's probably saying what most people think he's saying.

I read the whole article and the rest of it was the left bitching and moaning about Trump, bringing up January 6th and claiming that Trump wanted to suspend the Constitution. Did I miss something?

 

[Route 45]

I read the whole article and the rest of it was the left bitching and moaning about Trump, bringing up January 6th and claiming that Trump wanted to suspend the Constitution. Did I miss something?

His very words say that the alleged massive fraud allows for terminating rules, regulations and articles, including ones found in the Constitution. How do you interpret that? It seems clear to me, but maybe I'm missing something?

 

[KLB]

I read the whole article and the rest of it was the left bitching and moaning about Trump, bringing up January 6th and claiming that Trump wanted to suspend the Constitution. Did I miss something?

Yes. He posted the Truth Social post under the link

 

[KLB]

His very words say that the alleged massive fraud allows for terminating rules, regulations and articles, including ones found in the Constitution. How do you interpret that? It seems clear to me, but maybe I'm missing something?

Did you add it after the fact? I didn't see it at first either.

 

[Route 45]

Did you add it after the fact? I didn't see it at first either.

Yeah, I meant to add it, then realized I didn't and had to go back and edit. Sorry for the delay.

 

[Ingomike]

That's why I posted the story and the actual post. Gonna be a lot of spin both ways. Knowing Trump's ego, though, I think he's probably saying what most people think he's saying.

Except you miss the punctuation that clearly defines the point he is making, no spin necessary.

“do you throw the Presidential
Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the
RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW
ELECTION?”

See the question mark in the question he asked? It was not a statement. It was a question then followed by a couple of opinions.

“A Massive Fraud of this type and
magnitude allows for the termination of all rules,
regulations, and articles, even those found in the
Constitution.”

“Our great "Founders" did not want,
and would not condone, False & Fraudulent
Elections!”

 

[Route 45]

Except you miss the punctuation that clearly defines the point he is making, no spin necessary.

“do you throw the Presidential
Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the
RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW
ELECTION?”

See the question mark in the question he asked? It was not a statement. It was a question.

I think you're entirely missing the important part of his post. Keep reading.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

His very words say that the alleged massive fraud allows for terminating rules, regulations and articles, including ones found in the Constitution. How do you interpret that? It seems clear to me, but maybe I'm missing something?

My interpretation was that he was saying the fraud itself allows for those things. As in the fraud actually did/caused those things, not that he was advocating those things.

 

[Ingomike]

I think you're entirely missing the important part of his post. Keep reading.

Reread the post now completed.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Yes. He posted the Truth Social post under the link
View attachment 240507

I stand by my interpretation. Sounds like he was calling for a "do-over".

 

[Ingomike]

My interpretation was that he was saying the fraud itself allows for those things. As in the fraud actually did/caused those things, not that he was advocating those things.

So R45 believes that once a vote fraud is perpetrated the result cannot be corrected in any way, and so far the courts seem to agree with him, to the detriment of the country…

 

[Route 45]

So R45 believes that once a vote fraud is perpetrated the result cannot be corrected in any way, and so far the courts seem to agree with him, to the detriment of the country…

The vote fraud has to be proven first. Like, in a court of law. Not in your mind.

The real believers, the ones who actually got up off of their asses and went to DC on January 6, had their chance. But they took selfies instead of rifles. I think that in the end, they didn't even really fully believe their own BS. At least not enough to actually do something about it.

And neither do you.