Trump 2024 ???

[jamil]

That's not going to happen.

I doubt it, but I can hope. I also have little faith in Republicans if they did take both houses. They’ll play it safe in desperation to keep their seats.

 

[BugI02]

In other news, people who are not me and have a following in the real world continue to point to Trump as the goto guy for taking back America

Pornstar ****ing (2006) and 'grab them by the *****' (2005) are not mentioned, for some reason. Perhaps they decline to do the left's work for them

The Historical Meaning of Donald Trump

www.theepochtimes.com

 

[BugI02]

I doubt it, but I can hope. I also have little faith in Republicans if they did take both houses. They’ll play it safe in desperation to keep their seats.

Then replace those republicans

The Red Wave Is Not Just Inevitable, It's Also Conservative

Voters understand that the hour is late. Conservative warriors are being summoned by citizens ready to fight for the things that they love.

thefederalist.com

 

[Jaybird1980]

Then replace those republicans

The Red Wave Is Not Just Inevitable, It's Also Conservative

Voters understand that the hour is late. Conservative warriors are being summoned by citizens ready to fight for the things that they love.

thefederalist.com

I always love this. We can't even get our own worthless R's replaced.

No chance the others are going to be replaced in one cycle.

 

[BugI02]

I always love this. We can't even get our own worthless R's replaced.

No chance the others are going to be replaced in one cycle.

If you read the article, you will see some notable success at challenging CoCrublicans in republican primaries, as well as see that one of the many not-Trump darlings of the RINOs, Christie Noem, doesn't seem as interested in taking back America as she is in carrying water for the old order

 

[BugI02]

We can't even get our own worthless R's replaced.'We' would imply you took some active part in the attempt. If you wait until Election Day it is too late

'We' would imply you took some active part in the attempt. If you wait until Election Day to get involved it will be too late

Make sure you get what you like, else you'll have to like what you get

 

[jamil]

Then replace those republicans

The Red Wave Is Not Just Inevitable, It's Also Conservative

Voters understand that the hour is late. Conservative warriors are being summoned by citizens ready to fight for the things that they love.

thefederalist.com

When possible. I’m not even all that concerned about conservatives replacing what we have now. Any America-First candidates would be better than the CoC Republicans.

But, voters have to be careful. Many Republicans got elected as “TEA party” candidates and turned out to be duds. They just hitched themselves up to the name. If Republicans smell a wave coming, they try to smell like the wave to make a political career for themselves. After the TEA Party’s fall from popularity, people tried to latch onto “Trumpism” to ride that wave. I’m still not sure what to think of Dan Crenshaw, but I kinda don’t want more like him.

Just saying people need to know what they’re getting.

 

[Ingomike]

2024 is a long way off yet.
If Biden and his handlers double down on what they have been doing the next few years we might not have a country anymore.
Maybe not the same country where our republic still functions. Something closer to Orwell' view of the world in his 1984 book.

Hey now, we have to get these disagreements aired now, there likely will no no power to run the internet in 2024…

 

[jamil]

If you read the article, you will see some notable success at challenging CoCrublicans in republican primaries, as well as see that one of the many not-Trump darlings of the RINOs, Christie Noem, doesn't seem as interested in taking back America as she is in carrying water for the old order

That’s the point. Do they really put America first or are they grifters riding the wave of populism to make a career?

 

[jamil]

In other news, people who are not me and have a following in the real world continue to point to Trump as the goto guy for taking back America

Pornstar ****ing (2006) and 'grab them by the *****' (2005) are not mentioned, for some reason. Perhaps they decline to do the left's work for them

The Historical Meaning of Donald Trump

www.theepochtimes.com

Oh hell. I forgot about grab them by the *****. But seriously, I did not think much about that one. It’s like lockeroom talk.

Imagine Kamala’s girl-talk about her conquests.

 

[BugI02]

When possible. I’m not even all that concerned about conservatives replacing what we have now. Any America-First candidates would be better than the CoC Republicans.

But, voters have to be careful. Many Republicans got elected as “TEA party” candidates and turned out to be duds. They just hitched themselves up to the name. If Republicans smell a wave coming, they try to smell like the wave to make a political career for themselves. After the TEA Party’s fall from popularity, people tried to latch onto “Trumpism” to ride that wave. I’m still not sure what to think of Dan Crenshaw, but I kinda don’t want more like him.

Just saying people need to know what they’re getting.

Hopefully that standard applies to current not-Trump faves, also

There is one mentioned often who won his election via recount with < 0.4% of the vote, will not be tested by re-election until this year's election, basically is drafting off Trump and was endorsed by the Club for Growth

Dan Crenshaw should not be trusted with a CR2032 let alone any real power. There is a definite power hungry vibe rolling off that dude in waves

 

[bwframe]

"Three justices, appointed by one president, Donald Trump..."

 

[jamil]

"Three justices, appointed by one president, Donald Trump..."

It was never a federally protected constitutional right. The justices that decided RvW legislated from the bench and just declared abortion a constitutional right, from thin air. They ruled on it that way because it was the policy they wanted.

 

[KG1]

Well done for the 3 justices who Donald Trump nominated that came through in deciding landmark cases. DT's picks proved to be the right ones and it worked out.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

At least the Turtle kept MG out....or was his present position the plan?

 

[BugI02]

It was never a federally protected constitutional right. The justices that decided RvW legislated from the bench and just declared abortion a constitutional right, from thin air. They ruled on it that way because it was the policy they wanted.

I am always aghast and appalled, but not surprised, by the left's unwarranted assumption that a liberal SCOTUS was how things were meant to be

They always ignore the fact that a liberal court was a recent development and SCOTUS was very conservative for a very long time until it became politicized as a pathway to liberal desires that was an end run over winning in the legislature, it being easier to change the ideology of nine men in robes than 535 men in congress

 

[jamil]

I am always aghast and appalled, but not surprised, by the left's unwarranted assumption that a liberal SCOTUS was how things were meant to be

They always ignore the fact that a liberal court was a recent development and SCOTUS was very conservative for a very long time until it became politicized as a pathway to liberal desires that was an end run over winning in the legislature, it being easier to change the ideology of nine men in robes than 535 men in congress

Agreed but I thin the courts have been used to cement particular interests into case law for a very long time.

 

[KG1]

I am always aghast and appalled, but not surprised, by the left's unwarranted assumption that a liberal SCOTUS was how things were meant to be

They always ignore the fact that a liberal court was a recent development and SCOTUS was very conservative for a very long time until it became politicized as a pathway to liberal desires that was an end run over winning in the legislature, it being easier to change the ideology of nine men in robes than 535 men in congress

The recent decisions took an important step toward reigning in the court's activism. Both at the circuit appellate level in the new one tier strict scrutiny guidelines that they must follow based upon historical text and traditions consistent within the framework of the 2nd Amendment and at the SCOTUS level by overturning a previous court's judicial legislative act known as RvW and returning it to the States where it always belonged.

That's why it is so important the make-up of the court needs to consist of a majority of conservative leaning originalist justices to combat judicial activism.

I know some of us have been picking at Trump's faults, including myself but I will give him credit where credit is due and if he wasn't elected the current make-up of the court would've been much different and these recent decisions would never have been possible.

So, here's a MAGA tip of the hat to Donald J. Trump on this one.

 

[BugI02]

That's why it is so important the make-up of the court needs to consist of a majority of conservative leaning originalist justices to combat judicial activism.

Agreed, and I would further stipulate that the originalist mindset is important also because SCOTUS should predominantly be the final arbiter on the constitutionality of any law - and a thorough knowledge of the constitution and the contemporary writings of the framers would seem to be important in divining just what the original intent was and remaining faithful to it

 

[KG1]

Agreed, and I would further stipulate that the originalist mindset is important also because SCOTUS should predominantly be the final arbiter on the constitutionality of any law - and a thorough knowledge of the constitution and the contemporary writings of the framers would seem to be important in divining just what the original intent was and remaining faithful to it

Absolutely. The mandate that SCOTUS is tasked with is to solely determine the Constitutionality within the intent of the founding document based on historical text and tradition to uphold any lower court ruling. In the case of overturing RvW there was no historical text and tradition to be found that empowered a previous SCOTUS to grant abortion as right which should've been left to the States and the people to determine. SCOTUS should not be creating rights.

Personal bias or political ideology permeating within the judicial branch should not enter into the equation and we were warned of the perils of doing so by the framers.