We don’t need to worry about confiscation, we’re safe.
Note:
If you’re doing the confiscation, you’re not.
One of those statements are tongue in cheek…
We don’t need to worry about confiscation, we’re safe.
We don’t need to worry about confiscation, we’re safe.
Note:
If you’re doing the confiscation, you’re not.
One of those statements are tongue in cheek…
Paintballs are entirely capable of causing serious bodily injury. Catch one in an unprotected eye and you may well be minus vision in one eye. Same for a tooth or an ear.
Threat of serious bodily injury is a criteria for the use of deadly force. The individuals who participated in the afront against the citizens are very lucky they still breathe.
They had a slight advantage with an armored vehicle and body armor.The individuals who participated in the afront against the citizens are very lucky they still breathe.
Reckon all the elected leaders that gave the orders all got re-elected?Paintballs are entirely capable of causing serious bodily injury. Catch one in an unprotected eye and you may well be minus vision in one eye. Same for a tooth or an ear.
Threat of serious bodily injury is a criteria for the use of deadly force. The individuals who participated in the afront against the citizens are very lucky they still breathe.
Language warning. Colion is a little upset.
Rightly soColion is a little upset.
This wins the internet for the day. Congratulations.
Paintballs are entirely capable of causing serious bodily injury. Catch one in an unprotected eye and you may well be minus vision in one eye. Same for a tooth or an ear.
Threat of serious bodily injury is a criteria for the use of deadly force. The individuals who participated in the afront against the citizens are very lucky they still breathe.
NY Post picked it up yesterday.So I am curious exactly what the curfew orders were, and the validity and scope of them under Minnesota law.
‘Light ‘em up!’: Police shoot paintballs at Minneapolis residents standing on their porch
Governor of Minnesota says almost 11,000 National Guard members will be deployed in citywww.independent.co.uk
Advocates want officers charged in Stallings case
A group of civil rights advocates want criminal charges for officers seen on body cam video searching for curfew violators to shoot with rubber bulletswww.kare11.com
Indiana code which primarily speaks regarding curfews is related to minors. From what I can tell it is about being in a public space. Standing on one's own porch on one's own land is I believe hard to call a public space. The public is not invited into my yard or onto my porch.
The timing of all this is well documented.
He served, by all accounts I've heard, ably and well up to his service as E-8.
But then there's a couple of problems- a 6 year contract in 2001, taking his enlistment out to 2007...and then he retired in 2005 2 months before his unit deployed. we can debate the "why" and the "how", but that happened.
Beyond that, he was conditionally promoted to CSM, but that promotion was conditioned upon his completion of Sgt. Maj. Academy, then service as a CSM for 2 years thereafter. He completed neither, retired reduced to E-8 Master Sergeant, as he had to be because he did not meet the conditions, but continued to call himself a CSM and to promote having been a CSM.
He said he carried weapons in war, but just like me, he was never in a combat zone or in combat of any kind.
"Swift boating" is what some will call it to make it sounds like there's unsupported claims on one side, but what I put above, as I can tell, are undisputed facts. Make of them what you will.