There you go folks. No such thing as a Biden admin. Just foot-soldiers of the big money…
Was that the guy in the video?
Which version? The original or the modern feminist update?I’ll say it again. Read “1984” ! ! !
It's getting closer every dayIs it time yet?!?!?!
Well they better get the younger generations working instead of protesting"The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population. We start with the old, because as soon as they exceed 60-65 years, people live longer than they produce and that costs society dearly. Then the weak, then the useless that do not help society because there will always be more of them, and above all, ultimately, the stupid. Euthanasia targeting these groups; Euthanasia will have to be an essential tool in our future societies, in all cases. Of course we will not be able to execute people or build camps. We get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good. Overpopulation, and mostly useless, is something that is too costly economically. Socially, too, it is much better when the human machine comes to an abrupt standstill than when it gradually deteriorates. Neither will we be able to test millions upon millions of people for their intelligence, you bet that! We will find or cause something a pandemic targeting certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus affecting the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and stupid will believe in it and seek treatment. We will have made sure that treatment is in place, treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots then takes care of itself: You go to the slaughter by yourself. ” [The future of life – Jacques Attali, 1981] Interviews with Michel Salomon, Les Visages de l’avenir collection, éditions Seghers. “
Just finished reading "The future of life" and it may as well be the script,as it seems to be nearly exactly what they are doing.
How about that, more ******** actions by a government to force a food crisis. I'm shocked.
"Looking to committee national suicide"?
That is not the world we live in. Editors are an artifact of history with a few exceptions. The wrong word does not show in spell check. Conservative news has even less editor involvement as it does not have legacy systems in place. It is just falling into a leftist driven trap to discount conservative media. On that basis alone..."Looking to committee national suicide"?
See, this is why I get skeptical over some of the sites I see posted. Seems like a reputable site would have spell check or at least an editor to look at what they're publishing. One of the things they teach us with regards to OPSEC/INFOSEC at work is to look for misspellings of common words. Those are a red flag.