The (Current year) General Political/Salma Hayek discussion Thread Part V

[nonobaddog]

Not quite, it maybe a violation of the regulations depending on how it's used and in what circumstances. Not saying I agree with it, just that the article puts it's own spin on it.

As discussed in Section III, the use of certain language, including “illegal alien”and “illegals,”with the intent todemean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons constitutes discrimination under the NYCHRL

Agreed, it is getting harder to find articles that don't add their own spin. It also seems like it would be very easy for someone to claim they take offense at ANY use of "illegal aliens" and thus expanding the effect of that section to cover ALL usage.

Overall this is another shining example of libtard guano-brain thinking.

 

[JettaKnight]

THAT is the problem you have with this??

Well, it's a year old, so how many $250K (or lesser amounts) fines have been levied as a result of this?

 

[printcraft]

Well, it's a year old, so how many $250K (or lesser amounts) fines have been levied as a result of this?

Who gives a ****?
The very idea that it was enacted in the first place is the problem.

 

[nonobaddog]

[h=1]New York willing to send police to prison to keep illegal aliens[/h]https://thehill.com/opinion/immigra...-send-police-to-prison-to-keep-illegal-aliens

 

[foszoe]

I do.

I like to hear whether stupid regulations, if they have been enforced, are struck down by the courts or not.

Who gives a ****?
The very idea that it was enacted in the first place is the problem.

 

[foszoe]

Was kinda humorous the article didn't use the phrase "illegal aliens". Perhaps the author is in New York?

New York willing to send police to prison to keep illegal aliens

https://thehill.com/opinion/immigra...-send-police-to-prison-to-keep-illegal-aliens

 

[nonobaddog]

Was kinda humorous the article didn't use the phrase "illegal aliens". Perhaps the author is in New York?

That is one take on it. I found it more scary and not humorous at all.

 

[JettaKnight]

Who gives a ****?
The very idea that it was enacted in the first place is the problem.

Well, the article wasn't clear, it seemed more like a guideline than any sort of law.


And if a law is enacted, and never enforced, well, then carping about it is kind of pointless, isn't it?

 

[foszoe]

That is one take on it. I found it more scary and not humorous at all.

I'm like a director. I can do multiple takes .

 

[BugI02]

Who gives a ****?
The very idea that it was enacted in the first place is the problem.

This. I thought we were against 'hate speech' laws and indeed the very idea of 'hate speech'

 

[nonobaddog]

Well, the article wasn't clear, it seemed more like a guideline than any sort of law.
And if a law is enacted, and never enforced, well, then carping about it is kind of pointless, isn't it?

New York is still an important city in the US. When the libtards running it start controlling speech and making parts of speech illegal with a $250,000 fine that should raise the hackles of any freedom loving American patriot.

 

[Ingomike]

WTF? Yes, and tell me again how Trump was running everything and there was no deep state...

[h=1]FBI changes story, finally admits it has thousands of pages of documents about Seth Rich[/h]
https://lawflog.com/?p=2410

 

[actaeon277]

[video=youtube;MqENCMXJqbY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqENCMXJqbY[/video]

 

[Ingomike]

[video=youtube;MqENCMXJqbY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqENCMXJqbY[/video]

We are at war with China, they hacked our election, they are behind all this turmoil...

Wake up folks...

 

[ghitch75]

We are at war with China, they hacked our election, they are behind all this turmoil...

Wake up folks...

 

[Alpo]

We are at war with China, they hacked our election, they are behind all this turmoil...

Wake up folks...

I read it was Russia. One of us is probably correct.

Russian government spies are behind a hacking campaign that has breached U.S. agencies and a top cyber firm

 

[BugI02]

I read it was Russia. One of us is probably correct.

I notice you don't actually cite WaPo, just quote it

I find it funny that agencies that can't determine which countries breached Clinton's homebrew server or determine the veracity of the Hunter laptop can conclude it was Russians in what - a day or two. Certainly not possible that was propaganda or anything

Are the Russians paying JiaJiang Joe, too?

 

[foszoe]

Speaking of Russia

https://www.reuters.com/article/BigStory12/idUSKBN28N0PG

 

[Hawkeye]

I read it was Russia. One of us is probably correct.

No. Stop being silly. 'Twere the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.

 

[bwframe]