The coming war with Iran

[rooster]

Despite what some say we have went the last 8 years without starting a “new” war. Now less than a week into the new administration and these are the stories I’m seeing on foreign press.
The beating of the at drum will grow louder. My prediction is the bombs start dropping within 6 months to stop any discussion of the election fraud. Nothing brings Americans together like a good ol fashioned invasion of the axis of evil.

Iran enriching uranium

Iran could ‘easily’ enrich uranium to 90 percent nuke level, but is studying ‘if there is a need’ – atomic energy agency

Iran can produce 8-9 kg of 20%-enriched uranium per month, has plan for more centrifuges to meet 120kg goal – nuclear chief

first visitor to Israel from the new admin is CENTCOM general to discuss Iran problem. Very symbolic because Trump had moved Israel to USEUCOM previously, this was important because CENTCOM is focused on active combat operations in the Middle East where as USEUCOM is not focused on active combat operations

CENTCOM general to visit Israel as Biden admin. looks to deal with Iran

McKenzie’s upcoming visit comes at a time of increased tension in the region due to Iran’s continued aggression.

m.jpost.com

 

[phylodog]

Anything and everything they can do to destroy this country is currently on the table in the oval office.

 

[TangoFoxtrot]

Iran's primary goal will be the elimination of Israel while China and Russia work to keep us from helping israel.. China and Russia primary means is to attempt to bring us to civil war so we will be in to deep to do anything along with anti-semetic leaders like Obiden, Harris, AOC, ohmar and the list goes on.. when you see the 3rd temple being built which requires the destruction of the Muslim temple on the Mount, that is when things are really going to get out of control..

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

 

[Kutnupe14]

I’d be surprised if we go to war, beyond proxies, with Iran. Iran, regardless of what anyone thinks, seems to be a rational actor. Their leaders, today, a well less radical than what we saw in the 80s, and were almost some 40 years beyond that. The most likely scenario for a military confrontation, is then obtaining the bomb, outsourcing it to a terrorist, and then blowing up someplace. If it’s traced back to Iran, then things will get hot. The is, will Iran want to take that risk?

 

[Gd999]

Hmmm. Just what small minority, that has massive representation in our government, would want us to go to war with Iran. Iran and NK are the only two countries without the globalist banks.

 

[76Too]

I’d be surprised if we go to war, beyond proxies, with Iran. Iran, regardless of what anyone thinks, seems to be a rational actor. Their leaders, today, a well less radical than what we saw in the 80s, and were almost some 40 years beyond that. The most likely scenario for a military confrontation, is then obtaining the bomb, outsourcing it to a terrorist, and then blowing up someplace. If it’s traced back to Iran, then things will get hot. The is, will Iran want to take that risk?

Tell us again about these ‘rational actors.’

I like that part the best.

 

[Route 45]

I’d be surprised if we go to war, beyond proxies, with Iran. Iran, regardless of what anyone thinks, seems to be a rational actor. Their leaders, today, a well less radical than what we saw in the 80s, and were almost some 40 years beyond that. The most likely scenario for a military confrontation, is then obtaining the bomb, outsourcing it to a terrorist, and then blowing up someplace. If it’s traced back to Iran, then things will get hot. The is, will Iran want to take that risk?

Maybe the Senate can save us from going to war with Iran right after they save us from an "assault rifle" ban.

 

[Twangbanger]

Whatever happens, none of it will be motivated by any desire to "stop discussion of election fraud." It's already stopped. Media is back on-leash. Rainbows and unicorn farts. We saw this in 2009. Everybody should remember that like a bad Will & Grace re-run.

And war with Iran? Pssh. You're forgetting that the Democrat position is to perform fellatio on them, not go to war with them. Obama staked his foreign policy legacy on the proposition that they are actually the "good guys" in the region. Identity politics is what Democrats are doubling down on, and undermining the legacy of the FSBP (First Sorta Black President) and admitting his whole plan was basically wrong would not be a good move, when your next medium-range move is to prepare the country for the FFSBP (First Female Sorta Black President).

 

[OurDee]

Bomb Iran!

 

[BigRed]

Anything and everything they can do to destroy this country is currently on the table in the oval office.

It is the nature of the "progressive".

 

[Kutnupe14]

View attachment 122383

Tell us again about these ‘rational actors.’

I like that part the best.

View attachment 122384

I’m not seeing how two pictures of Iranian boats somehow detracts from my statement. Do you care to try and explain your point? ...because I’m at a loss.

 

[phylodog]

Might have something to do with Iranians boarding a US Ship not too long ago.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

Can someone post a YouTube video"Michigan Congressman Bill Huizenga,a Democrat,made this video" WOW! Thank you.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Might have something to do with Iranians boarding a US Ship not too long ago.

What makes that action irrational? Was there a severe penalty associated with that act? States do what they can get away with, and avoid things that they can’t. That makes them rational. When they simply don’t care, and are willing to accept the penalties which ultimately may threaten the existence of a particular govt or regime, then the action is irrational.

 

[phylodog]

 

[phylodog]

The dems are going full on treason against the sovereignty of this country in an attempt to set up a worldwide ruling class.

 

[76Too]

...because I’m at a loss.

seems like a common theme with you.

 

[phylodog]

What makes that action irrational? Was there a severe penalty associated with that act? States do what they can get away with, and avoid things that they can’t. That makes them rational. When they simply don’t care, and are willing to accept the penalties which ultimately may threaten the existence of a particular govt or regime, then the action is irrational.

What makes it rational? How could anyone involved not see the way that situation was handled could have easily sparked a conflict. One US sailor refuses to kneel and gets shot for it and it would have been game on (assuming Obama would have cared).

 

[TangoFoxtrot]

The dems are going full on treason against the sovereignty of this country in an attempt to set up a worldwide ruling class.

I agree 100%... they have spent decades putting politicians in key points to ensure the fox is in charge of the hen house.. the question is.. how do we stop them?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

 

[Kutnupe14]

seems like a common theme with you.

Obviously. And yet, it seems most common whenever I engage with someone who doesn’t know what they’re talking about.