40calPUNISHER
Master
- Apr 23, 2008
- 2,333
- 48
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
The AR15 lower is not a firearm...
- Thread starter 40calPUNISHER
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Noticed this in the article, "a lack of logic and consistency, which has created a climate in the firearm industry wherein it is nearly impossible for the reasonable man to be able to operate in good faith within the law." Huh, go figure.
Things like this may very well open a HUGE nasty can of worms when it comes to what We The People can do when it comes to buying parts/pieces.
Generally I'm in favor of stamping out ambiguity when we can. But the potential exists that buying parts and marrying them together would then be "manufacturing". And that, in and of itself isn't a huge deal since we (generally) can manufacture our own stuff - but resale / trading of said items can be made a hell of a lot more difficult and a lot more illegal.
Generally I'm in favor of stamping out ambiguity when we can. But the potential exists that buying parts and marrying them together would then be "manufacturing". And that, in and of itself isn't a huge deal since we (generally) can manufacture our own stuff - but resale / trading of said items can be made a hell of a lot more difficult and a lot more illegal.
This ain’t good for gun owners, Congress is going to get back involved with firearms, this time defining what constitutes a firearm! From the rear thingy that goes up, to the bayonet launcher, etc. it won’t end well. I see AR’s becoming two different registered parts both requiring 4473’s.
Like several others, I don’t see any good coming from this. The laws were written by people that have very little knowledge of what they are trying to regulate. The ATF tries to interpret the word salad that they were delivered. Sometimes it works in “our” benefit, sometimes not. If Congress is tasked with trying to straighten this out, nothing good will come from it.
Dupe
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...ower-not-firearm-after-all-4.html#post8055760
Oh, and do you want to fill out a 4473 for the upper receiver? 'Cause this is how you end up filling out a 4473 for an upper receiver.
It is no more difficult to "convert" an upper receiver "to expel a projectile by action of an explosion" than it is a lower receiver.
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...ower-not-firearm-after-all-4.html#post8055760
Oh, and do you want to fill out a 4473 for the upper receiver? 'Cause this is how you end up filling out a 4473 for an upper receiver.
It is no more difficult to "convert" an upper receiver "to expel a projectile by action of an explosion" than it is a lower receiver.
Last edited:
nonobaddog
Grandmaster
So it must be time to buy some guns before they **** it up worse.
Kirk Freeman
Grandmaster
Not this nonsense again.
You oughta have a macro so you can insert that response with a single keystroke.
Every time I bring one of my guns to the range with a "brace" I always get that feeling like someone wants to run and tell the ATF LOL I know its legal and I'm following the rules but I agree with you, I thought these would be taken off of the shelves by now.
nonobaddog
Grandmaster
Mmmmm... crunchy!
