So, clearly, I missed something...

[Bigtanker]

Relax everyone. Calm down. I found the loophole. Those rules do not apply to anyone here. Those rules mention a site called ingunowners.com. We’re exempt!! We’re on indianagunowners.com.

Check again........

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Check again........

 

[JCSR]

 

[KellyinAvon]

Check again........

Need ominous music playing with this one. Dun-dun--DUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!

 

[Mij]

Relax everyone. Calm down. I found the loophole. Those rules do not apply to anyone here. Those rules mention a site called ingunowners.com. We’re exempt!! We’re on indianagunowners.com.

Loophole, smoophole. Please don’t tick off the mods, some of us are on thin ice already we don’t need them trigger happy.

 

[Bigtanker]

Loophole, smoophole. Please don’t tick off the mods, some of us are on thin ice already we don’t need them trigger happy.

I see you swung by the fishing thread.....

 

[buckwacker]

The notification system isn't 100% all of the time.

Well, if it's truly random, you might need to send it out 10-15 times to make sure you get full coverage. You're all welcome.

 

[Bigtanker]

Well, if it's truly random, you might need to send it out 10-15 times to make sure you get full coverage. You're all welcome.

I'm not typing up another 53,000+ notices. That took me days to do.

 

[rhamersley]

Well, if it's truly random, you might need to send it out 10-15 times to make sure you get full coverage. You're all welcome.

 

[Mij]

I see you swung by the fishing thread.....

Don’t recall which one it was, just saw the msg. And got it.




edit: and I see I got a laugh emoji so I’m chalking that up as #3 towards my needed 50 quality posts.

On corse for the year 2054 to complete’em

 

[Frosty]

I'm not typing up another 53,000+ notices. That took me days to do.

I want a refund, mine had a typo!

 

[BigRed]

Imagine honoring a poll for BigRed as mod without a single negative vote!

 

[jsx1043]

I posted a meme the referenced a man's testicles as "balls".
Does this make me a bad person?

I posted a picture of troll, when a mod specifically stated that it was war on trolls…

 

[Libertarian01]

I'm not typing up another 53,000+ notices. That took me days to do.

You're not...? Sissie!

 

[buckwacker]

I'm not typing up another 53,000+ notices. That took me days to do.

Come on man, you gotta do something to earn that mega mod money. Swinging the hammer is the easy part.

 

[snapping turtle]

Section 230 is being looked into Supreme Court wise. Soon owners of social media will find out if they can edit and delete posts or limit in anyway what can be said on the internet in general. Either no one will be allowed to post or anything will be allowed to be posted.

I guess INGO is social media. Good luck sorting out things (looks like you’re doing a good job) or letting the court decide what must be done.
I think the cases are one against twitter and one against Facebook but it has been some time since I saw the article describing the cases.

 

[Mij]

The day they take control of the content allowed/disallowed in this venue away from the mods is the day I self perma ban myself——— from all internet b.s. I can only surmise the owner of the site will likewise turn in his spurs. JMO

 

[thompal]

Well, if it's truly random, you might need to send it out 10-15 times to make sure you get full coverage. You're all welcome.

And then send out a notification saying that a notification was sent.

 

[ditcherman]

And then send out a notification saying that a notification was sent.

And then make a phone call, asking if we got the email, because we didn’t respond to it immediately.

 

[radar8756]

Section 230 is being looked into Supreme Court wise. Soon owners of social media will find out if they can edit and delete posts or limit in anyway what can be said on the internet in general. Either no one will be allowed to post or anything will be allowed to be posted.

I guess INGO is social media. Good luck sorting out things (looks like you’re doing a good job) or letting the court decide what must be done.
I think the cases are one against twitter and one against Facebook but it has been some time since I saw the article describing the cases.

They could do like GOOGLE and FLICKR does --
Require you to set your Account as
"SAFE" = Family ( Default Setting )
or
"View All Content " - which is your consent - so you can't complain

The tricky part is YOU have to set every Pic / Post / Comment as Family or Restricted -- where you can be Penalized for not setting something Restricted that THEY think should be - with different Guidelines depending on if you are one of their Advertisers or Post things they don't like