Report: No "Global Warming" for 325 Months...

HoughMade

Grandmaster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oct 24, 2012
31,877
149
Valparaiso
No surprise there. When the mantra transformed from "global warming" to "climate change" that should have told us that the evidence for warming was failing.

There is now and has always been climate change. Whether mankind can influence anything more grand that the air immediately around us that we breathe (not insignificant), has not been established.
 

red_zr24x4

UA#190
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
Mar 14, 2009
25,200
113
Walkerton
We've had ice-ages, Deserts were once covered with trees, etc. I think the Earth is going through a natural cycle, We will have colder than normal years and hotter ones.
The earth is running a "cleaning cycle" as in temperature shifts to regulate the earths population...only the strong survive.
 

GodFearinGunTotin

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Mar 22, 2011
40,276
113
Mitchell
Where do you even hear this being talked about any more? Up to about a year ago, there were still stories on tv, publicity campaigns, etc. of folks showing their concern and support. But now? About the only you peep you hear is out of the torch bearers (the Obama's, Gore's of the world). Main stream media talk of this really has dwindled. I think many of them have even put their Koolaid cups down.
 

ArcadiaGP

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
11   0   0
Jun 15, 2009
31,721
113
Indianapolis
I heard Rush's take on it yesterday, and I think it sounds plausible.

Young people these days need a purpose. They need to feel they are "saving the world" and "making a difference"... and something like Climate Change gives them a target to throw their work and money behind. They've been told through their entire upbringing that it exists, and that it will end the world. They hear their idols tout it, so it must be true... people they believe are credible. They get fake statistics shoved down their gullets by the MMFA/OFA/Vox/HuffPo/MSNBC/Salon/Gawker/Bill Nye's of the world.

They'll find an explanation for everything, including this story, too.

Already seen it argued that "man made climate change" can cause prolonged periods of unusually inactive weather.
 

HoughMade

Grandmaster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oct 24, 2012
31,877
149
Valparaiso
I heard Rush's take on it yesterday, and I think it sounds plausible.

Young people these days need a purpose. They need to feel they are "saving the world" and "making a difference"... and something like Climate Change gives them a target to throw their work and money behind. They've been told through their entire upbringing that it exists, and that it will end the world. They hear their idols tout it, so it must be true... people they believe are credible. They get fake statistics shoved down their gullets by the MMFA/OFA/Vox/HuffPo/MSNBC/Salon/Gawker/Bill Nye's of the world...

Take away purpose on one had, and try to replace it on the other...with something that makes increased government control of private industry not only acceptable, but necessary. I can buy that.
 

ModernGunner

Shooter
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jan 29, 2010
4,750
63
NWI
The claim by Gore and his left-loon conspiracy whackjob liberals is "global warming". No one should let them get away with 'modifying' it to 'global climate change' so it doesn't damage their fragile sensibilities and lunatic agenda. THEY started the raucous screaming about "global warming", so let 'em own it.

Gore's made >$100,000,000 off his P.T. Barnum-like scam. Why's he not in jail for perpetrating fraud and bilking suckers out of millions?

Everyone should've known the whole thing was a scam when Gore was touting a DENTIST as some 'global warming expert' in "An Inconvenient Truth". Notice how the liberal-loon democRATS began shouting down and denigrating ANY evidence, elicited from ANYONE that disagreed with their global warming panic agenda? Did the same thing in the early 70's with global freezing.

Even further evidence was Gore (and others) creating the idea of buying 'carbon offset credits'. And WHO was Gore et. al. buying carbon offsets FROM? Why, Al Gore, of course! And a few others that came up with this new little scam for themselves. Little hard to buy into his global warming crap when Gore is doing ZERO to actually reduce carbon emissions; just paying himself to 'borrow some air' from some unknown person(s).

Of course, NOW those low-lifes tell ya, "That's not the point. The point was to raise global awareness, so it's still valid". What a huge pile of cow:poop: They liars, and they make no apology for the damage they've caused perpetrating such a scam for their own benefit, even when the premise is absolutely wrong. With Liberal-loon democRATS, being wrong or perpetrating crime is irrelevant. It's the agenda that's important.

The Liar-In-Chief is a supreme example of that.
 
Last edited:

BigMatt

Master
Rating - 100%
8   0   0
Sep 22, 2009
1,833
48
Wow, ModernGunner. Don't sugar-coat it. Tell us how you really feel!

The claim by Gore and his left-loon conspiracy whackjob liberals is "global warming". No one should let them get away with 'modifying' it to 'global climate change' so it doesn't damage their fragile sensibilities and lunatic agenda. THEY started the raucous screaming about "global warming", so let 'em own it.

Gore's made >$100,000,000 off his P.T. Barnum-like scam. Why's he not in jail for perpetrating fraud and bilking suckers out of millions?

Everyone should've known the whole thing was a scam when Gore was touting a DENTIST as some 'global warming expert' in "An Inconvenient Truth". Notice how the liberal-loon democRATS began shouting down and denigrating ANY evidence, elicited from ANYONE that disagreed with their global warming panic agenda? Did the same thing in the early 70's with global freezing.

Even further evidence was Gore (and others) creating the idea of buying 'carbon offset credits'. And WHO was Gore et. al. buying carbon offsets FROM? Why, Al Gore, of course! And a few others that came up with this new little scam for themselves. Little hard to buy into his global warming crap when Gore is doing ZERO to actually reduce carbon emissions; just paying himself to 'borrow some air' from some unknown person(s).

Of course, NOW those low-lifes tell ya, "That's not the point. The point was to raise global awareness, so it's still valid". What a huge pile of cow:poop: They liars, and they make no apology for the damage they've caused perpetrating such a scam for their own benefit, even when the premise is absolutely wrong. With Liberal-loon democRATS, being wrong or perpetrating crime is irrelevant. It's the agenda that's important.

The Liar-In-Chief is a supreme example of that.
 

BogWalker

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
4   0   0
Jan 5, 2013
6,296
63
How do the global warming folks explain the ice age (a period of global cooling) followed by the melt off of the glaciers (a period of global warming), both of which occurred before humanity could have any feasible affect on climate? It happened once naturally, it can happen again naturally.

Let's not forget the mini ice age that occurred from the 1600s to mid-1800s. Not exactly a lot of automobiles or factories in that time period.
 

rhino

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
24   0   0
Mar 18, 2008
30,906
113
Indiana
Already at 15 responses and we have yet to be lectured on our intellectual inadequacy and inability to interpret scientific data.

I'm SHOCKED!
 

drop45

Expert
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jun 23, 2012
916
28
My empire of dirt
Looks like Alfons Gore is going to have to go on a spending cut now that global warming has been debunked. Perhaps he can sell us on global freezing now that winter is right around the corner and make another 100 mil for his phat as%
 

HoughMade

Grandmaster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oct 24, 2012
31,877
149
Valparaiso
How do the global warming folks explain the ice age (a period of global cooling) followed by the melt off of the glaciers (a period of global warming), both of which occurred before humanity could have any feasible affect on climate? It happened once naturally, it can happen again naturally.

Let's not forget the mini ice age that occurred from the 1600s to mid-1800s. Not exactly a lot of automobiles or factories in that time period.

If you are part of the scientific "consensus", you don't have to explain anything. You point at anyone who does not blindly accept your conclusions and berate them as unscientific, uneducated, and childish.
 

88GT

Grandmaster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Mar 29, 2010
16,643
83
Familyfriendlyville
Already at 15 responses and we have yet to be lectured on our intellectual inadequacy and inability to interpret scientific data.

I'm SHOCKED!

Be patient. They just haven't made it here yet.
 

Site Supporter

INGO Supporter

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
493,687
Messages
8,935,868
Members
48,544
Latest member
Zmh95
Top Bottom