But what does NPR say he should think?You need to read more of what the theorists write themselves. It’s cultural marxism all the way down.
But what does NPR say he should think?You need to read more of what the theorists write themselves. It’s cultural marxism all the way down.
I think they think he should think: Drag shows for kids to dress up as strippers and dance in front of men suggestively is just harmless fun and totally normal.But what does NPR say he should think?
Sure it is. All the hip parents are doing it.I think they think he should think: Drag shows for kids to dress up as strippers and dance in front of men suggestively is just harmless fun and totally normal.
Perfectly normal…
He’s probably an elementary school teacher.If you are taking your kids to see that ****, you had best stay the hell away from my kids.
Use their proper pronoun. They like to be called Democrats(instead of the racist term "anyone").These ****ers are sick and demented! Anyone that is for this is sick and demented as well!!!
I do think the term trans gets misused. The post I quoted was dubious that the LGBT people increased from 2 to 16%, it wasn't about such an increase in just transgender people. Experience tells me there are a great many more "not 100% straight" people than 2%. I have spent a lifetime watching how religious thugs, viciously dictate who people are allowed to love. A good example is Allen Turing, the scientist that helped crack German encryption in WW2. He without doubt helped to defeat Germany but was prosecuted for being gay. People don't honestly talk about who they are in that kind of environment.Do you think that queer theory as practiced gasslights people into thinking they might be trans? I kinda think that chart doesn't prove your case. Instead you have to deny that queer theory is being practiced.
There is only one type of transexual. Those who truly have gender dysphoria. And that's very rare. The rest is just woke nonsense unsupported by real ass science. Theory-grifters can certainly gaslight people into thinking they are just about anything.
Gender is a spectrum between feminine and masculine. Sex is male or female. You're not *a* gender. You're somewhere along the spectrum of feminine to masculine. The former is influenced by nature and nurture. The latter is purely nature. It's biology. It's fixed. A male can be more feminine. A female can be more masculine. That doesn't change their sex.
But anyway, males are most typically on the masculine side of the spectrum. Females are typically on the feminine side of the spectrum. That is not primarily because of social constructs. It's primarily because of biology, though it's also somewhat social as well. A male can be conditioned to be more feminine. A female can be conditioned to be more masculine. If left to hormones, they'll be what they are.
People who have real ass gender dysphoria are uncomfortable with their genitals because they feel like they're the opposite sex. It's a psychological condition. That's not disparaging, it's just the case. Their dysphoria does not change their biology. We won't even get into the efficacy of gender affirming therapies. The point is, real transgenderism is that. Gender dysphoria.
The point is, it appears to be your assertion that the number of people who have real gender dysphoria has not actually increased, but that as trans has become more acceptable, more and more people are self-reporting, so it makes the cases go up. I think that's probably true to an extent. But given the delusions out there of gender fluidity, the self-reporting problem is quite small.
TicTok is full of delusional examples of these ideologically possessed people feigning to decide what gender they feel like today. THAT is purely a social construct. If left to nature, they'd be quite stable in where in the gender spectrum they are. Queer theory practice in the classroom socially constructs the **** that fills their brains.
Let these kids grow up normally. It's called normal for a reason. It's what has evolved from the beginning. It's nature that has made men, men; and women, women. Not the patriarchy.
Plenty of sick and demented ****ers on the Republican side of the aisle as well, especially in politicsUse their proper pronoun. They like to be called Democrats(instead of the racist term "anyone").
They are just more open. Kind of like how inter-racial marriages were less common before 1967, but then, lo and behold, it became more common when laws banning it were deemed unconstitutional. Inter racial attraction didn't increase.Frequently Asked Questions About Sexual Health
WebMD answers common questions about circumcision, male menopause, birth control, and more.www.webmd.com
I have never once watch Tucker. Matter of fact I have not watched any TV news in about 15 years. I am not religious. I am not a Republican.I do think the term trans gets misused. The post I quoted was dubious that the LGBT people increased from 2 to 16%, it wasn't about such an increase in just transgender people. Experience tells me there are a great many more "not 100% straight" people than 2%. I have spent a lifetime watching how religious thugs, viciously dictate who people are allowed to love. A good example is Allen Turing, the scientist that helped crack German encryption in WW2. He without doubt helped to defeat Germany but was prosecuted for being gay. People don't honestly talk about who they are in that kind of environment.
Also that chart isn't meant to PROVE the point, it's just and example of a similar thing. Also, while sex and gender are separate things, I do not think 100% of people are strictly male or female. To be clear I'm talking about from the point of view of the brain. So far as I can tell all brains start out as female. As a male develops in the womb, the mother's body delivers different hormones to the fetus that "masculinizes" it. I think variance from the typical delivery is how transgender people are made. Studies have shown transgender brains are more similar to the sex they identify as. I also think that male and female brains are the default, but nature doesn't do mathematically perfect binaries. There is always scatter in nature, it's bi-modal, not binary. Bodies are not strictly binary either. Intersex people are as common as red headed people.
Transgender people are just the latest bogey man being used by the far-right to keep people angry and scared and voting for them. There's no "trans agenda" or mass child grooming. That's just Tucker Carlson BS to get ratings. Add trans people to the list moral panics including women voting, "the jews", blacks raping white women, satanic music, gays etc.
I'm skeptical that it's 16%. Perhaps in your experience, the primary examples that come to your mind might be in an area more accepting of LGBT, so they tend to live in that area. For example, I would not be surprised if 40% of Californians were LGBT. California has historically had a lot of transplants from all over the country, because of weather, Hollywood, opportunities, and whatnot. I suspect that LGBT people from more conservative areas would tend to migrate there. So, though certainly some of your experience might be due to people feeling more free to express themselves as LGBT, it's reasonable to say your experience might also be due to where you live. Unless you live in Missippi. it's probably closer to 0.01% that would admit it.I do think the term trans gets misused. The post I quoted was dubious that the LGBT people increased from 2 to 16%, it wasn't about such an increase in just transgender people. Experience tells me there are a great many more "not 100% straight" people than 2%. I have spent a lifetime watching how religious thugs, viciously dictate who people are allowed to love. A good example is Allen Turing, the scientist that helped crack German encryption in WW2. He without doubt helped to defeat Germany but was prosecuted for being gay. People don't honestly talk about who they are in that kind of environment.
Also that chart isn't meant to PROVE the point, it's just and example of a similar thing.
Also, while sex and gender are separate things, I do not think 100% of people are strictly male or female. To be clear I'm talking about from the point of view of the brain. So far as I can tell all brains start out as female. As a male develops in the womb, the mother's body delivers different hormones to the fetus that "masculinizes" it. I think variance from the typical delivery is how transgender people are made.
Studies have shown transgender brains are more similar to the sex they identify as. I also think that male and female brains are the default, but nature doesn't do mathematically perfect binaries. There is always scatter in nature, it's bi-modal, not binary. Bodies are not strictly binary either. Intersex people are as common as red headed people.
Now here I thought you were posting in good faith. I think the right does tend to be weary of things out of the ordinary. It's a temperament. I wouldn't say there's a "trans agenda" as it relates to real trans people. I think they mostly want to be left alone and not mocked or bullied or used by ideologues.Transgender people are just the latest bogey man being used by the far-right to keep people angry and scared and voting for them. There's no "trans agenda" or mass child grooming. That's just Tucker Carlson BS to get ratings. Add trans people to the list moral panics including women voting, "the jews", blacks raping white women, satanic music, gays etc.
For example, I would not be surprised if 40% of Californians were LGBT.
Like I said in the above post, yeah, I think they're more open. I think your point is more valid for gays, though, than it is for trans. I think a large number of trans people today, especially the ones who have obviously made up genders, say they're trans because they're ideologically possessed.They are just more open. Kind of like how inter-racial marriages were less common before 1967, but then, lo and behold, it became more common when laws banning it were deemed unconstitutional. Inter racial attraction didn't increase.
I noticed that in reporting they've now gone to saying "pregnant people".But what does NPR say he should think?
What kind of people can get pregnant? It's a mystery!I noticed that in reporting they've now gone to saying "pregnant people".
What kind of people can get pregnant? It's a mystery!