So the dude’s a whore too?That's a bit of a non sequitur, isn't it? The original complaint was that women who engage in certain behaviors are called "whores", while the men who co-equally engage in those behaviors are not similarly described. I'm merely stating that any description applies to both parties, equally.
Personally, I don't call anyone such (or any other) names. People are free to engage in whatever consenting, lawful activities they choose. I only insist that they take responsibility for the consequences of their decisions and actions.
Not a non-sequitur. This is *aught” discussion not an “is” discussion. It seems like a lit of work to go through to justify calling them whores. Does that definition seriously fit?