Interesting new additions to EForms

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Angrysauce

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 30, 2020
    522
    93
    Kokomo
    1000001136.jpg
    More options. Draft, Submitted, Approved, and Disapproved were clearly insufficient.
    Now we have Partial and Conditional Approvals, Abandoned, and Revoked.
    The next few months are gonna be ****ed.
     

    xwing

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 11, 2012
    1,151
    113
    Greene County
    The Q&A is a hoot too. Apparently, you can't even touch an NFA item thats not registered to you.
    View attachment 250422

    That Q&A was blowing up the internet last week. However, NSSF contacted ATF regarding that Q&A. Below is ATF's response:
    “The Q&A currently listed on the eforms account is incorrect. In this scenario, the registered owner of the NFA weapon is co-located with the firearm and thus no transfer has occurred. However, if the person firing the NFA weapon is prohibited from possessing the firearm there could be a GCA violation. We are working to correct the site as quickly as possible.”
    link.

    So that's good news. The ATF is not redefining "possession" and making it illegal to let your (non-prohibited) friend shoot your NFA item in your presence. (Although you always wonder if they were telegraphing a future planned infringement...)
     

    bobzilla

    Mod in training (in my own mind)
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 1, 2010
    9,070
    113
    Brownswhitanon.
    That Q&A was blowing up the internet last week. However, NSSF contacted ATF regarding that Q&A. Below is ATF's response:
    “The Q&A currently listed on the eforms account is incorrect. In this scenario, the registered owner of the NFA weapon is co-located with the firearm and thus no transfer has occurred. However, if the person firing the NFA weapon is prohibited from possessing the firearm there could be a GCA violation. We are working to correct the site as quickly as possible.”
    link.

    So that's good news. The ATF is not redefining "possession" and making it illegal to let your (non-prohibited) friend shoot your NFA item in your presence. (Although you always wonder if they were telegraphing a future planned infringement...)
    Not redefining possession YET. They only become more bold and brazen the more they get away with
     
    Top Bottom