They sell every gun they make, at exorbitant prices. Why change?Henry can't supply the products it already makes. Not sure why they find it necessary to expand their catalog when people can't get the guns they already produce.
Same that was a really good feature.After watching the video, I will say that the only thing that might be interesting about these revolvers is the easily removable cylinder. They are dodo birds if they don't introduce a 9mm cylinder to go with them.
I truly enjoy owning and shooting revolvers and I have had no complaints with the new Henry lever actions. I hope the revolvers are as dependable and finished as well as their levers. My issue is the revolvers look too much like the Nagant M1895.Looks like the bastard child of an illicit coupling of a High Standard and an H&R.
No need to, since those guns already exist and are in current production. At least this Henry has its own look, even if it's not exactly a beauty queen.Henry is excellent at coping quality, historic firearms. Why didn’t they choose to mimic the Ruger Vaquero, Blackhawk, Redhawk, Colt SA, snake guns or S&W K, L or N frame.
I wish they would have gone with a profile more reminiscent of the Colt New Service. They could have chambered models from 38 Special up to 45 Colt and with barrel options of 4”, 5”, and 6”. I would have been interested in a 5” 44 Special if they’d traveled down that path.No need to, since those guns already exist and are in current production. At least this Henry has its own look, even if it's not exactly a beauty queen.
They could have changed a couple of proportions and had a nice revolver reminiscent of the Colt Lightning, with modern internals. A Bisley grip double action revolver with a swing-out cylinder would also be interesting.