Grammatically speaking.

[OutdoorDad]

There are a lot of new members and since iI had pulled it up for my own ammunition locker I bumped it for those that may not have read it yet.

And I thank you.
Very quick, informative read.

 

[level0]

Thanks for the link. I've read it before, and enjoyed reading it again.

Seconded. Thanks for the bump!

 

[2A_Tom]

Bumped because there are a lot of new members who may want to save this link.

 

[2A_Tom]

Bump, because I have been citing it a lot lately.

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Bump, because I have been citing it a lot lately.

The original link seems to just go to the Constitution Society website, but not to a particular article. Is there a more current link?

 

[2A_Tom]

Wow, I did not know the link was broken, I have posted the old link 2 or 3 times.

J. Neil Schulman: The Unabridged Second Amendment

 

[DoggyDaddy]

Wow, I did not know the link was broken, I have posted the old link 2 or 3 times.

J. Neil Schulman: The Unabridged Second Amendment

Thanks Tom! That worked.

 

[clelaj]

Should not this study of the Constitution be part of our schools curriculum? And this fact based without political interpretation approach be used with each part of the Constitution? Need to get back to the foundation of our great country and people without the drift of scope and purpose caused by years of political interpretation for "the parties in power".

 

[2A_Tom]

Yeah, like that's going to happen in the USSSA.

 

[DadSmith]

Wow, I did not know the link was broken, I have posted the old link 2 or 3 times.

J. Neil Schulman: The Unabridged Second Amendment

Thank you for reviving this. I'm going to copy paste it to my note pad and I have shared your link with many on my cellphone contacts.

 

[MinuteManMike]

 

[Ingomike]

The problem is, both sides of the political spectrum refuse to nominate, or are unable to get confirmed, judges that rule using originalism and original intent as their only guide.
Reaching a conclusion any other way will inject a political agenda into the ruling.

A perfect Supreme Court Justice for me would be somebody who looking back over their record, there's no indication of what their personal political leanings were.
They simply called it straight.

Yet the closest to this I ever saw in my lifetime was nominee for the supreme Court Robert Bork.
And they shot him down because he was an originalist who ruled with reliance on original intent as his guide.

Today the candidates are all schooled by the same indoctrination in the law schools and internships...

 

[SnoopLoggyDog]

Thank you for posting the updated link. It is a very good read.