19th and 21st come to mind...Create a new amendment to override parts of another amendment, that makes alot of sense.
19th and 21st come to mind...Create a new amendment to override parts of another amendment, that makes alot of sense.
To his credit, this is the ONLY legal way to do it. The only way to step on an amendment is a new amendment.Create a new amendment to override parts of another amendment, that makes alot of sense.
I agree in principle, but I don't think we want the PRC on our continent.Here's a 28th for ya...trade California and Hawaii for all outstanding Treasuries PRC holds. The exception is, we retain Pearl Harbor.
Four less D Senators, 40+ less D reps.
Heck, they are coming in via Mexico, so we should at least get out of debt for it.I agree in principle, but I don't think we want the PRC on our continent.
Same game plan as Hogsett just on a national scale. Claim that just one more gun law would make America safe but Republicans won't let it happen.At least he's being honest about his desire to strip gun rights away from the Constitution. Better than all the "back door" stripping of gun rights that's been happening for the past many decades. Of course it's "better" because it has absolutely no chance of ever passing. But he knows that; he's just spewing more hot air to claim his throne on the national scene as "tough on gun rights". All the Dems want to do is one-up each other to show they hate freedom and America more...
To his credit (and little of that), a Constitutional amendment is the only actually legal way to really restrict gun rights.
Take your 28th amendment and stick it straight up your ass you ****ing commie bastard.
I'll see your slime and raise you.Slime
How about BAD luck. Like 14 years’ worth?Far be it from me to say anything positive about that POS, but I have long said that the ONLY gun control advocates I respect, though just a little, are those who call to amend the Constitution.
It is the only correct way to get where they want us to go.
I wish him luck. He's gonna need it.
How about an amendment to nuke and pave California and start I er from scratch with that embarrassment.How about we propose the 29th amendment F'ING TERM LIMITS FOR ALL CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS.
Sell them to Mexico instead. But only after creating a new port in Oregon or Washington to replace the ports in CA.Here's a 28th for ya...trade California and Hawaii for all outstanding Treasuries PRC holds. The exception is, we retain Pearl Harbor.
Four less D Senators, 40+ less D reps.
If only that would help, but it is now evident that the real problem is the perpetual bureaucratic state seemingly accountable to no one and is ever present from administration to administration and congress to congress no matter who is elected.How about we propose the 29th amendment F'ING TERM LIMITS FOR ALL CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS.
To his credit, this is the ONLY legal way to do it. The only way to step on an amendment is a new amendment.