Yes. Double checking results are good. Both sides should welcome it.About time
You realize you are quite literally asking the thieves to change the rules so they cant win the same way again, right?There should be federal rules for elections. We need to get this into congress right now. The sooner this becomes a topic of conversation, the sooner we get somewhere on it.
Every vote must be authenticated, period.
No more national election stealing from a few "swing states."
We could very well be one election away from never winning again.
Yes. Exactly. Again and again and again.You realize you are quite literally asking the thieves to change the rules so they cant win the same way again, right?
Let me guess, you also expect them to take up term limits as well and slit their own throats? Good luck with that too.Yes. Exactly. Again and again and again.
We need bills proposed now and on the news EVERY day until the election in 2022.
Without free and fair elections, nothing else matters.Let me guess, you also expect them to take up term limits as well and slit their own throats? Good luck with that too.
I guess nothing else matters then. because this was far from fair. Or legal. Like changes to the process that require state legislatures to act, yet they didnt and governors made (state) constitutionally invalid changes to the mail in rules, and even the courts ignored it saying "close enough".Without free and fair elections, nothing else matters.
Apparently dismissing each instance individually is acceptable. I saw a chart that showed each "minor infraction that wouldnt have impacted the election" laid out side by side. Yes. each one in and of itself would not have changed the election. But if you put them all together, combined they would have tripped the election in Trump's favor if only 90% of them were true.Vote fraud is no conspiracy. It happened, it's documented.
Now the question is how much vote fraud is acceptable?
How much is OK to still call the election legitimate?
How much fraud in "swing states" is passable for Hoosiers and Buckeyes and Hawkeyes and...???
It's a tough sell. States don't want to risk losing the federal funding.What about a convention of the states? Can't state legislatures reign in some control from an out of control, unconstitutionally operating congress & senate?
How many states does it take?
This is why I'm against a constitutional convention. I don't trust anyone now days. I'm sure they would destroy the constitution completely. I refer to them as educated idiots.And as I understand it, you dont convene a specific convention. Once the convention is enacted, folks can pile on whatever they want. So it can be started for say congressional term limits, but some a**hat can suggest another amendment that would repeal the 2nd amendment because it is outdated.
So be careful what you wish for. (feel free to correctme if I am wrong, I wont be offended)
There should be federal rules for elections. We need to get this into congress right now. The sooner this becomes a topic of conversation, the sooner we get somewhere on it.
Every vote must be authenticated, period.
No more national election stealing from a few "swing states."
We could very well be one election away from never winning again.
This is why I'm against a constitutional convention. I don't trust anyone now days. I'm sure they would destroy the constitution completely. I refer to them as educated idiots.
Then we have ourselves to blame. What would it take to get the federal government and state governments back to obeying the constitution?It'd be better if they did destroy it and get it over with, so conservatives would stop attempting to use it against themselves. It's already completely unenforced and disrespected in every possible way.