Do you have time?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 5, 2022
    42
    18
    Columbia City, IN
    Comparing the time of technique
    An article I wrote just appeared in Shooting Illustrated. You might find it interesting.

    (And yes, I know that the camera caught the shot as my finger was still coming off the trigger. If I had realized that I would have sent the next one in the series where my finger is totally off. Rest assured that the muzzle was still on target and my finger was completely off by the rack and roll. Performing this entire process in 1.2-1.3 seconds means a lot of stuff happens at once.)

    For video of the experiment you can watch, check out our Facebook page.
     

    ditcherman

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2018
    7,690
    113
    In the country, hopefully.
    Looks like a very well thought out set of experiments, and a great read.
    I will just say that I was shocked that there was not a more significant time delay with movement or the tap, especially from the less experienced shooter. I think the delay would become exponentially greater with a little more distance, compared to the point and shoot distance of 3 yards.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 5, 2022
    42
    18
    Columbia City, IN
    Looks like a very well thought out set of experiments, and a great read.
    I will just say that I was shocked that there was not a more significant time delay with movement or the tap, especially from the less experienced shooter. I think the delay would become exponentially greater with a little more distance, compared to the point and shoot distance of 3 yards.
    Thanks!

    I expected a small increase in time as well. My pre-experiment expectation was that the discussion would focus on whether the added time was worth the extra procedural step. But no. This is why we do science!

    I expect the overall time would increase for each position In order to achieve the same level of accuracy as the shooter moves back. I don’t think you would see much increase at the same distance by adding the step left or right.

    If you’re curious there is video of the malfunction technique in real time on our Facebook page.

    One criticism I had on the malfunction drill was that i did not confirm the magazine was seated with a “tug” after the “tap.” I did not. If one performs a “tug” the time would increase significantly. You can see the iteration on video where i do the tap with a loose magazine and the tap alone gets the job done.
     

    gregkl

    Outlier
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    33   0   0
    Apr 8, 2012
    11,911
    77
    Bloomington
    That was a good read. Thanks for posting it. I have been taught Tap, Rack, Roll so I was glad to read that I don't have yet another process to unlearn!:)

    Moving off the "X" is something that I don't do so well. I have taken a class a couple times where we run a drill at the end incorporating lessons learned during the day. You get a "prize" if you execute the drill correctly. The one area I mess up every time is that you are supposed to be moving while you reload. I stand there like a statute while I change out my mag.:wallbash:
     

    Trapper Jim

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Dec 18, 2012
    2,686
    77
    Arcadia
    Thank you for your work that you put into the education process of shooting. While I understand about shutter timing regarding your finger, the bigger fail in some trainers eyes are manipulating the disabled firearm at arms length instead of bringing it into your “workspace”. Protection, dexterity and better return control of abled firearm are improved.

    See you on the range.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 5, 2022
    42
    18
    Columbia City, IN
    Thank you for your work that you put into the education process of shooting. While I understand about shutter timing regarding your finger, the bigger fail in some trainers eyes are manipulating the disabled firearm at arms length instead of bringing it into your “workspace”. Protection, dexterity and better return control of abled firearm are improved.

    See you on the range.
    Like i said, its a still frame in motion. The gun is tapped on the way into workspace but the rack and roll occurs in my workspace. Video available on my Facebook page.
     

    Attachments

    • 3DAFA158-FA0F-4494-AA70-B3F51814EDAC.jpeg
      3DAFA158-FA0F-4494-AA70-B3F51814EDAC.jpeg
      1,021.9 KB · Views: 1
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 5, 2022
    42
    18
    Columbia City, IN
    Here's another rightly informative video.

    Features Bill Blowers - owner and head honcho of Tap Rack Tactical.


    Ive seen this. In fact it was potentially the starting point for inspiring my experiment.

    IMO “not tapping” is skipping a potentially needed (albeit rarely needed) procedure in a malfunction clearance. Thus I was curious to see how much time I would lose by performing it. Now I have a data set to help me decide.

    The biggest data set for me is the one showing if i needed a tap but didn’t do one it literally doubles the split times.

    On the other hand, if i tap and its not needed, i lose essentially nothing…
     
    Top Bottom