Debunking 'Under The Gun' - Documentary or Propaganda?

OakRiver

Grandmaster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Aug 12, 2014
14,319
77
IN
 

d.kaufman

Still Here
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
104   0   0
Mar 9, 2013
7,901
149
Hobart
Seen earlier today hiw the edited the video to make th pro gunners look like they had no answer to a question she posed, but the audio tells otherwise. Wouldn't expect anything else from the lame stream idiot media
 

Kirk Freeman

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Mar 9, 2008
44,599
113
Lafayette, Indiana
The continual dumpster fire of NBC news:

 

Cameramonkey

Grandmaster
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
30   0   0
May 12, 2013
19,580
77
Camby area
And sadly, there is probably nothing this group can do legally.

I wonder if the competing media outlets will care enough about shining a light on how dishonest their competition is?

Naw... Probably not. They too are complicit in the anti gun message so they'll let the lie/defamation go.
 

KG1

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
66   0   0
Jan 20, 2009
14,251
149
This POS Stephanie Soechtig hack is a real piece of work and Couric is just as culpable for backing her lame ass response to critics of the way the documentary was presented. Both are hack pieces of trash.
 

VERT

Grandmaster
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
22   0   0
Jan 4, 2009
9,374
63
Seymour
If what those inks say is true and interviews were edited and John Lott was excluded then the episode deserves more then a 2.5 couric score.
 

M67

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
23   0   0
Jan 15, 2011
6,181
48
Southernish Indiana
If what those inks say is true and interviews were edited and John Lott was excluded then the episode deserves more then a 2.5 couric score.

Haha

For the reference

Urban Dictionary: Couric

Couric

The standard unit measurement for mass weight of feces, as noted on the 2007 South Park episode "More Crap". The European Fecal Standards & Measurements Board in Zürich keeps track of the authenticity of its records. It is mentioned in the episode that "one Katie Couric is about two and a half pounds of excrement"
 

KG1

Grandmaster
Rating - 100%
66   0   0
Jan 20, 2009
14,251
149
If what those inks say is true and interviews were edited and John Lott was excluded then the episode deserves more then a 2.5 couric score.
They don't think very highly of John Lott and crap canned his stuff claiming his data has been largely discredited even though they took the time to interview him for 4 hours.

Then they go ahead and pull their selective editing garbage.
 

VERT

Grandmaster
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
22   0   0
Jan 4, 2009
9,374
63
Seymour
They don't think very highly of John Lott and crap canned his stuff claiming his data has been largely discredited even though they took the time to interview him for 4 hours.

Then they go ahead and pull their selective editing garbage.

:tantrum: :tinfoil:
 

OakRiver

Grandmaster
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Aug 12, 2014
14,319
77
IN
Pardon my ignorance on the claims that John Lott was discredited, but what were the claims against his research and what were the counter points to the attempt to discredit/disprove him?
 

Cameramonkey

Grandmaster
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
30   0   0
May 12, 2013
19,580
77
Camby area
Pardon my ignorance on the claims that John Lott was discredited, but what were the claims against his research and what were the counter points to the attempt to discredit/disprove him?

They dont need statistical proof, silly. Feelings are good enough for them.
 

MCgrease08

Grandmaster
Site Supporter
Rating - 100%
32   0   0
Mar 14, 2013
10,857
149
Earth
Top Bottom