Abuses of Red Flag Law?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Lmo1131

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 11, 2020
    552
    93
    east of the Pacific
    I'm trying to carry on a 'conversation' about current, and proposed, Red Flag Laws with a friend and was asked to provide any instances of their abuse; where was law fraudulently was used to intimidate, accuse, someone.

    A search on the internet using words like, abuse, fraudulent, illegal, etc. turns up nothing but 'pro' articles about RFL.

    Has anyone heard of any cases where this has occurred? I'm sure they're out there, but how to find them.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,233
    113
    Merrillville
    Ask why it's necessary to provide proof.

    we have courts. Should we get rid of them, until abuse by government can be proved?
     

    Pointman

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 24, 2008
    51
    8
    Bainbridge
    If we passed a law that said your neighbor could come in and inspect your refrigerator at any time without notice, but there were no cases of it being "abused" does that make it good law?
     

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    38,175
    113
    Btown Rural
    Tucker Carlson talking on this right now...

    Hopefully, we can find a clip of it to post up later?

    Great monolog so far, giving the first 1/3 of the show and still talking. Names all of the back stabbing RINO's who say they will vote against us. Mentioned Lindsay Graham more than once.


    .
     

    Lmo1131

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 11, 2020
    552
    93
    east of the Pacific
    Tucker Carlson talking on this right now...

    My wife told me, I missed it, had a pet emergency I had to deal with.

    Ask why it's necessary to provide proof.

    Not 'proof' per se, this is a somewhat heated arguement between friends. His point of view is, 'don't worry about it, until it happens', which to our point of view is ridiculous; we know it will happen, if it hasn't already... and that's what I was looking for, a report that it had already happened.

    And apparently it is beyond his ability to imagine it happening to him. And come to think of it, if I did find 'evidence' of it he would probably label it was 'fake'... why do I bother?
     

    BigRed

    Banned More Than You
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 29, 2017
    19,212
    149
    1,000 yards out
    I would like to understand how these "red flag" laws do no fly in the face of Caniglia v Strom.


    Any thoughts from the attorneys here?
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,534
    113
    Fort Wayne
    I'm trying to carry on a 'conversation' about current, and proposed, Red Flag Laws with a friend and was asked to provide any instances of their abuse; where was law fraudulently was used to intimidate, accuse, someone.

    A search on the internet using words like, abuse, fraudulent, illegal, etc. turns up nothing but 'pro' articles about RFL.

    Has anyone heard of any cases where this has occurred? I'm sure they're out there, but how to find them.

    Are we limiting this to Indiana?


    Lame straw man arguments and YouTube fear mongering aside, Indiana has been pretty good about it. There is a situation in which a former INGOer had his guns removed under this, but those that looked into wouldn't call that abuse at all.

    IANAL, so my ability to see is limited, but I haven't seen abuses here.

    I have in the past posted a study of it's use in Indiana and the bottom line of that was that it had little effect on violence, but a measurable effect of suicides.


    We say we don't want dangerous people having guns, but then we're afraid that the law will be used against us; sort of a double edged sword.
     

    Lmo1131

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 11, 2020
    552
    93
    east of the Pacific
    Are we limiting this to Indiana?

    Certainly not. If "Republican" Senators cave it will became nationwide.

    Tucker cited a case that went to the Supreme Court and resulted in all nine Justices finding for the defendant; essentially defining Red Flag Laws as unconstitutional... haven't had time to replay the video (thanks for posting, by the way).
     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,204
    77
    Porter County
    Certainly not. If "Republican" Senators cave it will became nationwide.

    Tucker cited a case that went to the Supreme Court and resulted in all nine Justices finding for the defendant; essentially defining Red Flag Laws as unconstitutional... haven't had time to replay the video (thanks for posting, by the way).
    BR referenced the case.
    I would like to understand how these "red flag" laws do no fly in the face of Caniglia v Strom.


    Any thoughts from the attorneys here?
     

    Destro

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 10, 2011
    3,904
    113
    The Khyber Pass
    I would like to understand how these "red flag" laws do no fly in the face of Caniglia v Strom.


    Any thoughts from the attorneys here?
    I am not an attorney, but that case revolved around the "Community Caretaking" exception to the 4th Amendment, not an actual statutory Red Flag law. The actions the officers took were not based on a "Red Flag" law.
     

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    38,175
    113
    Btown Rural

     

    Hawkeye7br

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 9, 2015
    1,381
    97
    Terre Haute
    While not a direct red flag incident, let me relate what happened to me many years ago as an actual example of the dangers of unintended consequences.

    In the mid 1980's, my wife and I were having marital problems. We married young, had 3 kids, 12 years later things just weren't working for us. I made good money in the coal mine, but she spent it all and then some. No abuse, neither of us drank or did drugs, we lived a modest lifestyle and went to church weekly. We didn't even have shouting matches. Tried to make it work, it didn't, and eventually we ended up in divorce court. In court, her lawyer accused me of having mental problems and claimed to have written proof of me dealing with my mental health issues.

    Where did his "proof" come from? When our marriage got rocky, I insisted we seek professional counseling. Not with our 80 year old pastor, not one of her family relatives or a church elder, but a professional marriage counselor. So I called a service in a neighboring community, made an appointment, and we went a few times.

    It turned out the counselor was a member of the county mental health association. Her office was in a building leased or owned by the association. I didn't question either, why would I?

    I made the phone call, I made the appointment, I agreed to pay the bill, and those 3 things made me the "patient". My wife and I met with her in her office, and doing so meant I had "enrolled myself in a mental health facility for the purpose of resolving my mental health problems".

    Being stunned by the accusation worked in my favor. I explained to the judge what happened, my lawyer sat calmly, the judge accepted my testimony as a reasonable course of action in seeking to keep our marriage together. But imagine our world if something so simple can be used against you as a red flag, put your name on a public list, and be used to bar you from buying or owning firearms.
     
    Last edited:

    tim87tr

    Freedom lover
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jul 3, 2010
    1,424
    113
    Eastern IL
    I'm trying to carry on a 'conversation' about current, and proposed, Red Flag Laws with a friend and was asked to provide any instances of their abuse; where was law fraudulently was used to intimidate, accuse, someone.

    A search on the internet using words like, abuse, fraudulent, illegal, etc. turns up nothing but 'pro' articles about RFL.

    Has anyone heard of any cases where this has occurred? I'm sure they're out there, but how to find them.
    Some people need a link or an absolute "in their mind" reason for not giving up their rights. Lack of common sense, cognative thinking abilities and inability to recognize their constitutional rights is often a problem. Maybe a picture would help.....and ask him if he is a progressive:cool:

    Edit..oh hey Lew, I just noticed your screen name. Will send you a message sometime about our travels in TX and AZ, and get a West coast update. Didn't make it quite all the way to you to CA, but maybe next time. :thumbsup:

    FVKB0oDWYAIFouG.jpg
     
    Last edited:
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 7, 2021
    2,631
    113
    central indiana
    I'll skip my screed about how utterly unconstitutional Red Flag laws are. I will point out how stupid they are in practice. If ol' Uncle Henry is a danger, per some random complaint, why wouldn't we impound ol' Uncle Henry? He is the 'danger'. Impounding one type of tool but leaving other tools for the 'danger' to use misses the entire point of the RF laws. Frankly, I suspect that the RF action might just **** off the 'danger' even more. Addressing OP, I haven't looked for RF abuses but I'm sure they exist and will only become all the more common once courts start rubber-stamping the process. And they will.
     

    jwamplerusa

    High drag, low speed...
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 21, 2018
    4,289
    113
    Boone County
    What I wrote to the 10 RINO subversives is this

    "Do NOT deny citizens of this Nation due process before the law. “Red Flag” laws are disingenuous at best, and a dangerous precedent which can be weaponized at least. It is not rational to maintain someone is “too dangerous to have a gun”, but NOT dangerous enough to be removed from society. What about all of the other potential weapons the “Red Flagged” individual can still access?"

    I am increasingly concerned how Red Flagged laws may be weaponized. I have written to my State Representative multiple times asking that Indiana's law be amended to address the following.

    6. Amend Indiana's "Red Flag" law to place short duration hard timelines on the return of property and the restoration of all rights unless an individual is adjudicated mentally ill. Adjudication must be determined on a priority timeline, as it impacts a citizens Rights.​
    7. Amend Indiana's "Red Flag" law to institute clear criminal liabilities for false reporting, including making the reporter liable for all costs incurred by the individual impacted by a false or erroneous "Red Flag" accusation. The criminal penalties must include incarceration.​
     
    Top Bottom