People today, from both sides (one more so than the other), have been conditioned to believe they need a large federal government. Our founding fathers would support this man over any other and would be turn over in their graves if they saw the other candidates. I just do not foresee America...
I'm ending the argument because it is going in circles also. But I would like to thank you guys for being cordial and respectful; this is how debates should be. I would also hope that we can agree more than we disagree, being that this is a gun owners forum.
The problem is that they have allowed their personal scientific beliefs (atheism) affect the results. Recent studies have confirmed that the higher disbelief in God in the science profession is a result of upbringing and their family status, not their area of expertise. Ecklund, E. H. and C. P...
The problem lies with the fact that high percentage of scientists (I believe over 90%) working on the theory of evolution are atheists, which means they have already closed their mind and are not open to the existence of God. When you are not open minded and are looking at the evidence, the...
Intelligent Design scientists have their own personal religion, whether it be Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, or Atheism, but they do not let that get in the way of their research. The research itself is agnostic, which is where science should be.
I happen to like math and science also. I am not advocating that it be controlled by religion, actually quite the opposite. I am against it being controlled by atheism (which is a religion) which is the current situation. Science is meant to study the natural world by what it can and cannot...
If you read what I had posted you would have seen that the official position is agnostic. Reason and logic have gone out the window with atheism. You have to completely shut your brain down to not acknowledge their is a possibility that God exists. Agnostics take the position it is unknown...
I'm not advocating "no college" as you say, but I am saying don't take everything at face value. Had I believed what I had been taught then I would believe (1) the Constitution is a living breathing document; (2) Roosevelt got us out of the Great Depression with spending; (3) the United States...
Lol, this is all undergraduate colleges nowadays. Students do not question professors, they get lectured on what the answers are. When was the last time you were in college? Why do you think the majority of college students are sheep?
Actually in graduate school also, if you question the...
Actually Intelligent Design does not require faith, it takes the true position of science as agnostic (God can neither be proven or denied, unlike most evolutionary scientists who are atheists--denying the existence of God without proof).
What is the theory of Intelligent Design?
What is...
How about you check it out for yourself, here are a few resources:
Evolution News & Views
Explaining the Science of Intelligent Design
Rather than kids falling behind in math and science being to a loss of logic; have you ever considered parenting? Instead of teaching students, teachers are...
Another evolutionary scientist rejects the natural selection theory. Though he does not reject evolution, he proposes a new theory, which gives him trouble because it indicates intelligent design.
Even scientists who still believe in evolution are beginning to reject the natural...
Is your first response to any object you view was that it was spontaneously created or do you ask who created it? Why did we not have a car factory before humans if random events can create extermely complicated things, this would have been been far less complicated than a cell. Or as Bitter...
"[M]ultiple government-backed science museums sought to suppress AFA's constitutional and contractual right to express a pro-intelligent design viewpoint . . . They [Evolutionary Scientists] paint the picture of a culture of intolerance in which scientists and other academics, at least these in...
If you saw a painting, would you believe that nature created it through an entirely random event or would you ask who created it? Life is much more complicated than a painting. If random natural events can create life than you should also believe that random natural events can create a...
Heck it would require less faith to believe that life on earth was deisgned by an alien life form and then dropped onto planet earth than it would be to believe in atheism. But believing that does not solve the origins of life because then who created the aliens? It just kicks the can futher...
Believing in atheism requires more faith than believing there is a God. If you were to believe that life occurred from completely natural means, then you would have to completely ignore the complexity of the universe and of life. DNA is more complex than a 747, a toaster oven, even a...
The law of gravity is not historical science; it is completely 100% testable and observable today. There is no faith involved with the law of gravity because you can observe it for yourself. With evolution, you can only follow the fossil record; which doesn't necessarily support it. You can...
And why would this not be a good source for those people who are on the fence about the fossil record? If they have been on the fence after looking at the evidence and the theory from one side and don't know if they believe, why should they not look at the other side to see what it has to say...
I am open to science proving it either way. When there is over 10,000 scientists saying the theory does not fit the evidence, then not all scientists are on board. Where does this knowledge come from that is being offered? If if it is from college, then it is from the same closed minded...