Drunk driving checkpoint

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • amboy49

    Master
    Rating - 83.3%
    5   1   0
    Feb 1, 2013
    2,300
    83
    central indiana
    I just was made aware that law enforcement in Boone County are planning a DUI checkpoint event in the next few days. The article stated that, based on a decision by the Indiana Supreme Court, when stopped a driver is REQUIRED to provide name, address, and DOB or provide their drivers license. (State vs Gerschoffer) A comment regarding the event stated that drivers are not required to answer any questions nor submit to a field sobriety test. It was also stated the stop does not constitute and illegal search and seizure. And lastly, a driver is not required to go through the checkpoint and may take an alternate route to knowingly avoid it.

    First, I don’t understand the purpose of the requirement to identify or provide a DL. Secondly, just speculating, I’m wondering how the conversation will go after the initial “Have you been drinking “ question has been asked and the driver refuses to respond or answer the question ?

    I’ll admit I’ve watched my fair share of YouTube videos with police stops of this type. Generally the driver refuses to identify, the police get pushy, and there’s enough drama to make the episode entertaining in a sick voyeur sort of way. Eventually, with the driver remaining silent and “exercising their Fifth Amendment rights, the police allow the driver to be on their way while the driver proclaims his victory ”over the man.”

    Why the requirement to identify ? Seems like a fishing expedition to me for more than impaired driving.
     

    Born2vette

    Norm, Team woodworker
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    17   0   0
    Jul 25, 2020
    3,967
    113
    Westfield
    From what I understand (not a LEO or lawyer) If you are operating a motor vehicle and drive to a checkpoint they can require proof of a valid license. You have the right to stay silent and refuse a field sobriety check and a breathalizer but in Indiana having a drivers license you have consented to a chemical sobriety test. They can remove you and take you to a hospital for blood collection.
     

    Destro

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 10, 2011
    3,904
    113
    The Khyber Pass
    First, I don’t understand the purpose of the requirement to identify or provide a DL. Secondly, just speculating, I’m wondering how the conversation will go after the initial “Have you been drinking “ question has been asked and the driver refuses to respond or answer the question ?

    Impaired drivers sometimes have a hard time with tasks that divide attention.

    Impaired drivers have impaired judgment. Maybe they hand you a debit card or a CVS receipt instead of the requested documents. Maybe they have glossy eyes and seem to be moving slower than the past few drivers. Taking it all together, might be worth further investigation. You know many "silent" intoxicated persons? They are going to answer questions because not answering will, in their mind, look suspicious.

    If the driver provides the required information, and there aren't any other signs of impairment or criminal activity there isn't much they can do at a checkpoint.

    Sent from my SM-A536U1 using Tapatalk
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    Why the requirement to identify ? Seems like a fishing expedition to me for more than impaired driving.

    To check for impairment. As mentioned, people sometimes hand over a credit card, etc. but you get to see their eyes, hear their speech, notice reaction times, etc.

    Fun fact: Going through a legal checkpoint in Indiana is voluntary if you are paying a small bit of attention to the road and signage. There must be a sign indicating the presence of the checkpoint that allows an opportunity for a legal turn off and bypass for the checkpoint to pass standards set in case law.

    I'm not a fan of checkpoints, personally. You get more drunks off the road just running traffic enforcement. The rationale has been described to me as an educational/flag flying sort of thing to remind people enforcement is occurring.
     

    thompal

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 27, 2008
    3,545
    113
    Beech Grove
    I'm not a fan of checkpoints, personally. You get more drunks off the road just running traffic enforcement. The rationale has been described to me as an educational/flag flying sort of thing to remind people enforcement is occurring.

    Do the agencies get federal dollars for running checkpoints?
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    Do the agencies get federal dollars for running checkpoints?

    It's possible for the local department to get reimbursed for the overtime for the officers working it if it's through a NHTSA grant. Note that's possible for some amount of DUI enforcement overtime per year regardless and not unique to checkpoints. Basically the feds will fund a certain dollar amount of overtime for a grant receiving department for the year on a 'use or lose' basis, meaning you only get the funds after the hours are worked and accounted for. I don't know if you have to run checkpoints to participate in the grant or not, though.

    There used to be a few other programs that did similar things to fund officer overtime in construction zones and certain high fatality roads/intersections, but I don't know if they still exist as I've not done any sort of traffic enforcement for quite awhile at this point.
     

    Timjoebillybob

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Feb 27, 2009
    9,387
    149
    From what I understand (not a LEO or lawyer) If you are operating a motor vehicle and drive to a checkpoint they can require proof of a valid license. You have the right to stay silent and refuse a field sobriety check and a breathalizer but in Indiana having a drivers license you have consented to a chemical sobriety test. They can remove you and take you to a hospital for blood collection.
    They need a warrant for a forced blood draw, or other forced test. You can revoke your consent, but they can/will suspend your license if you do.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,897
    113
    Start requiring these checkpoints to affect the judges who ruled this "constitutional".

    How do they not, other than judges probably know to turn off once they see the sign if they don't want to go through? Even emergency vehicles have to stop unless on an active lights/sirens run. And yes, I've went through one on-duty and in a marked police car because I didn't know any quicker way to get where I was going. They did make me stop and I did show my license and then I went on my way.
     

    snapping turtle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 5, 2009
    6,498
    113
    Madison county
    Federal grants pay overtime and shift extras to pull these off during holidays. They increase enforcement check point or not. Also speeding and tailgate/seatbelt.

    Memorial Day, (Indy 500) July 4 (often on the lake nowadays) Labor Day (big one for normal check points)

    Add in greatful dead shows ect. Where the local agency might think money or vehicle seizures are a possibility..

    I guess it is like having extra wait staff at a restaurant during the holiday weekends.
     
    Top Bottom