Sorry ive been absent from the discussion.
I didnt mean to imply mandatory breathalyzers for anyone exiting an establishment with a liquor license.
Nor am I saying we need to spend eleventy billion on police salaries to do so.
I am simply saying maybe we need to look at preventing dui...
Appology accepted.
Didnt mean to sound offensive with the "intellegent discussion" comment. Just a pet peeve of mine when a post count is assumed as lack of honest interest in the topic.
Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk
He has a valid point this is my 5th post. But unfortunately for those who cant handle an intelligent discussion I wont be going anywhere. A low post count doesnt mean I'm simply a troll. It just means I arrived late to the party or just simple havent felt the need to post on a topic yet.
Back...
That's a pretty bold assumption to say absolutely "nobody" and it's also very interesting that you make up numbers to prove a point. You should try making up some more facts. It really helps support a logically and openminded discussion.
Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk
If it is truly about protecting the innocent from drunk drivers why dont the officers stand outside the bars offering free breathalyzer tests before people get in their cars?
Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk