"squatters rights"
Everything wrong with the concept is blatantly obvious.
Cops responding to illegal entry (squatterer) "It's civil, not criminal, so...hands tied"
Civil Asset Forfeiture : "You're not illegal, your money is. Give it to us." Oddly our hands aren't tied when collecting money...
Science (mental or otherwise) wants to be analytically specific. The human experience, perceptions and responses are the antithesis to specificity. "Dealing with..." is a real approach, while being "a victim" is often used as a shield by those not wanting to "deal with".
Probably a mix of cya with a dash of effort and sprinkled with a plausible defense should it be needed. I don't mind showing, but recording is a no-go for me.
"They implied that government requests or demands do not come with the implicit threat of action and that the government only crosses the line when it makes the threat of adverse action explicit."
A "demand" from the U.S. Government doesn't come with a threat of action? That's f'n rich.
What temp is too hot without a definition specific? Should/would 5 degrees change the verdict? What about one degree? How many bought the same coffee, at the same temp and didn't rec'v injury?
If the McD's coffee had been less than hot, subjectively, the buyer of the coffee could have sued for...
Did you feel that my stand alone comment was directed at you? Maybe you felt that way because you chose an EV. I'm not concerned with what you drive. Roll your coal electrically if you wish.
ICE is objectively superior in modern day America, including heavy traffic. Performance standards will...
Reasonable in the main. Peculiar in its application. You stated fairly something that could be viewed with exclusive differences, specifics being paramount. Respectively, the gov't interest(s) aren't [usually] balanced against my concept of harm potential.
Will you be taking off the lid and...
A thread titled, "No more investing in EV's" isn't an EV thread? Hydrogen can/should be discussed, but there is no denying that EV's are part of the discussion, per the thread title.
Who spilled the coffee? It wasn't McD's. They served a cup of coffee with a lid. Who removed the lid? How often do you place a potentially injurious item near your, ahem, lap? If the sign reads, "caution, wet floor", and I decide to walk across the wet floor, have I not assumed the liability of...
I appreciate that some find EV's to be acceptable to their lifestyle. EV's don't fit for many. As to racing specifically, I'll just note that entry of EV cars in the 24hrs of Lemans is actually hybrid. Seems 24hrs at speed requires some evil liquid called gas; or quicker "refills".
Suing McD's because one first ordered hot coffee, then placed said hot coffee between their legs, removed the lid and spilled the hot coffee on their lap. Also, the buyer described the pain and suffering as being greater due to wearing cotton pants as if that should be a consideration for McD's...