I hate this damn argument.
One camp is: we are entitled to all weapons.
Another camp: we aren't entitled to ****
Another camp: only muskets
Another camp: some but not all.
Everyone is very loyal to their camp and would never change their mind regardless as to stats,facts, tends, whatever. So what's the ****ing point of arguing about it?
One camp is: we are entitled to all weapons.
Another camp: we aren't entitled to ****
Another camp: only muskets
Another camp: some but not all.
Everyone is very loyal to their camp and would never change their mind regardless as to stats,facts, tends, whatever. So what's the ****ing point of arguing about it?