New York State rifle SCOTUS case granted certiorari

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • yote hunter

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    19   0   0
    Dec 27, 2013
    6,811
    113
    Indiana
    Long over do !
    Now the good guys have a fighting chance.

    Hard to believe that the left is mad about this because they have some of the highest crime/murder rate in the country and now people can defend themselves.!
    Well not really they are all D***h***s anyway.
     

    Jaybird1980

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 22, 2016
    11,929
    113
    North Central
    Long over do !
    Now the good guys have a fighting chance.

    Hard to believe the left that has some of the highest crime/murder rate in the country is mad that the people can now defend them selves.!
    Well not really they are all D***H***s anyway.
    Maybe you missed it, but it was pointed out that NYC is apparently one of the safest places in the country. Well it used to be, until now. :lmfao:
     

    Onebad06vtx

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 9, 2013
    1,010
    113
    Ellettsville
    There not happy about our victory.
    There heads are about to explode!I thought the governor was going to cry. lol
    About time we have people stand up for our country,GREAT JOB SUPREME COURT!!!!!!!!!!!!
     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,634
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    The Supreme Court can only do so much, if NYC ever does change anything i'm sure it'll be quite onerous to get a 'permit'. In the end it'll probably be about as useless as having one in Chicago where you can't carry on all forms of mass transit.
     

    Johnman98

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 27, 2021
    19
    3
    Indianapolis, IN
    What does this ruling mean for other states with similar laws as New York? Will they all immediately dissolve their may issue status and go to shall issue? Will those states have reciprocity with Indiana? Too early?
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,854
    77
    Camby area
    What does this ruling mean for other states with similar laws as New York? Will they all immediately dissolve their may issue status and go to shall issue? Will those states have reciprocity with Indiana? Too early?
    It SHOULD cause may issue to convert to shall issue. but I suspect its going to take lawsuits to make them comply.
    As to reciprocity? Not a chance. They are being FORCED to go to Shall issue. They arent going to give anyone any extra rights that they arent required to.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,854
    77
    Camby area
    The new talking point for today is below. I had never once seen this argument made in all my time wading around in anti-gun twitter. Today I'm seeing it everywhere.

    "In 1789, the Second Amendment was written.

    In 1847, the bullet was invented.

    Thus, the Second Amendment only applies to muskets."
    Desperate times call for desperate measures.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,854
    77
    Camby area
    This guy lives in the land of make believe like the many others freaking about over today's decision. But like the rest of them they don't take the trolley.. They all pile into the Short Bus :naughty: View attachment 207609
    Gee, that sounds mighty insurrection-ey. Might want to investigate him. Maybe lock him up for our safety until his trial.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    It SHOULD cause may issue to convert to shall issue. but I suspect its going to take lawsuits to make them comply.
    As to reciprocity? Not a chance. They are being FORCED to go to Shall issue. They arent going to give anyone any extra rights that they arent required to.
    You would think that one's 2nd Amendment Constitutional right to carry for self defense should grant them that same right from State to State. I mean other rights such as the 1st Amendment are universally applicable in all States no matter where we go.. Why not the 2nd Amendment?
     
    Last edited:

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Gee, that sounds mighty insurrection-ey. Might want to investigate him. Maybe lock him up for our safety until his trial.
    Olberdork is basically calling for an army of .gov jackboots to ignore Constitutional rights.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 7, 2021
    2,631
    113
    central indiana
    You would think that one's 2nd Amendment Constitutional right to carry for self defense should grant them that same right from State to State. I mean other rights such as the 1st Amendment are universally applicable in all States. Why not the 2nd Amendment?
    This is such a remarkable weirdness that freedom of speech is coast to coast, but 2a is not. And what of the three judges that dissented? They have every right to not like guns, wish guns were illegal for the masses. But to dissent on shall/may issue would demonstrate their disdain for my personal freedoms. Which of my rights aren't malleable according to the three dissenters? Three supreme justices believe a bureaucrat can dictate which citizens have value enough to exercise personal freedoms.
     
    Top Bottom