Well, I for one would consider it proof positive of fraud on a state level that would suggest it happened in more than just As. That's if it went 100% as they want it as you put it.I'm still not sure what the audit is hoping to accomplish.
Federal officials aren't present for it, afaik, so anything discovered will be immediately discounted. People are taking data devices home with them and returning them in the morning. All sorts of ridiculous stunts are being pulled that will almost certainly invalidate any findings.
The longer this goes on the longer it seems like more of a political stunt than actually trying to produce proof of wrong doing by democrats.
And I'm still waiting to hear what someone thinks the outcome of this would be even if it goes 100% as they want it to?
I'm still not sure what the audit is hoping to accomplish.
Federal officials aren't present for it, afaik, so anything discovered will be immediately discounted. People are taking data devices home with them and returning them in the morning. All sorts of ridiculous stunts are being pulled that will almost certainly invalidate any findings.
The longer this goes on the longer it seems like more of a political stunt than actually trying to produce proof of wrong doing by democrats.
And I'm still waiting to hear what someone thinks the outcome of this would be even if it goes 100% as they want it to?
Well, I for one would consider it proof positive of fraud on a state level that would suggest it happened in more than just As. That's if it went 100% as they want it as you put it.
It would prove bidiot is an illegitimate president......
And I would hope the SCOTUS would finally hear a case on election fraud
Feds are not involved in elections. Why would Feds be there? The constitution gives responsibility for elections to state legislatures. This is run by the state legislature.
What "stunts" are being pulled?
So even a guy like you is falling prey to the democrat stall tactics.
The outcome will result in a galvanizing of conservatives to clean up elections and focus on winning not petty intra issues. In other words get JK to say the Dems did wrong. LOL
So the only goal is even more polarization? I don't think that's going to accomplish anything. McConnell will deny it no matter what happens. GOP establishment will deny it no matter what happens. Dems will deny it no matter what happens.
3/4 of the republican base already believes the election was a fraud, 1/4 of dems believe the election was a fraud.
It just doesn't make much sense to me, as all the people who can be convinced already are convinced.
If nothing else it will begin the process of shutting down the 'Trump had many chances to make his case and no fraud was found' line of argumentationSo the only goal is even more polarization? I don't think that's going to accomplish anything. McConnell will deny it no matter what happens. GOP establishment will deny it no matter what happens. Dems will deny it no matter what happens.
3/4 of the republican base already believes the election was a fraud, 1/4 of dems believe the election was a fraud.
It just doesn't make much sense to me, as all the people who can be convinced already are convinced.
I'm pretty sure they also know they will lose any future chance of winning if they don't lock down elections, whether they're willing to publicly say as much is another matter. I don't see the GOP pushing for more mail in voting.
If nothing else it will begin the process of shutting down the 'Trump had many chances to make his case and no fraud was found' line of argumentation
To allow the Democrats to get away with provable election fraud in the belief that that will somehow lead to less polarization is just incomprehensible. They're not interested in getting along, they're interested in power BAMN
If the Democrats want less polarization, they can drop all the delaying and obfuscation tactics and let the chips fall where they may. I won't be holding my breath. Next you'll be telling us 'We're better than that'
I believe the possibilities are as endless as your imagination if fraud is proven at a National level to overturn the election.Okay, but lets follow it to a logical conclusion.
What is the end goal, should enough fraud be proven to invalidate the election? Trump can't legally re-enter the oval office on those grounds.
As far as my understanding of the law goes, if fraud was proven and the election was invalidated, Pelosi would become president. And we'd be saddled with a Pelosi presidency until 2024, unless there's some provision for a special election.
I’ve been pondering for some time if she is actually helping the audit movement in some way. She knows she will never get elected president but I’m sure she would love the power.invalidated, Pelosi would become president. And we'd be saddled with a Pelosi presidency until 2024
And I am going to answer my own question from two perspectives.Just what are they hiding? Why would they work so hard to stop an audit that should show the results they certified? This is our government if they have nothing to hide why not show it? They don't have constitutional protections for their data, it belongs to all of us. Why? Why? Why?
BREAKING: Maricopa County Elections Officials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE DIRECTORY from Voting Machines - Including "All Election Information" from Main Database -- With Copy of Senate Letter | The Gateway Pundit | by Patty McMurray
Last week, the Gateway Pundit reported about the emergency meeting that was called by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, after the County was reportedly unable to provide passwords to the auditors performing an audit of the county’s 2020 Election results. They also did not provide access...www.thegatewaypundit.com
Ff