Debunking 'Under The Gun' - Documentary or Propaganda?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • d.kaufman

    Still Here
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    128   0   0
    Mar 9, 2013
    14,718
    149
    Hobart
    Seen earlier today hiw the edited the video to make th pro gunners look like they had no answer to a question she posed, but the audio tells otherwise. Wouldn't expect anything else from the lame stream idiot media
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    47,969
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    The continual dumpster fire of NBC news:

    dumpster.jpg
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,687
    77
    Camby area
    And sadly, there is probably nothing this group can do legally.

    I wonder if the competing media outlets will care enough about shining a light on how dishonest their competition is?

    Naw... Probably not. They too are complicit in the anti gun message so they'll let the lie/defamation go.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,633
    149
    This POS Stephanie Soechtig hack is a real piece of work and Couric is just as culpable for backing her lame ass response to critics of the way the documentary was presented. Both are hack pieces of trash.
     

    VERT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Jan 4, 2009
    9,801
    113
    Seymour
    If what those inks say is true and interviews were edited and John Lott was excluded then the episode deserves more then a 2.5 couric score.
     

    M67

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Jan 15, 2011
    6,181
    63
    Southernish Indiana
    If what those inks say is true and interviews were edited and John Lott was excluded then the episode deserves more then a 2.5 couric score.

    Haha

    For the reference

    Urban Dictionary: Couric

    Couric

    The standard unit measurement for mass weight of feces, as noted on the 2007 South Park episode "More Crap". The European Fecal Standards & Measurements Board in Zürich keeps track of the authenticity of its records. It is mentioned in the episode that "one Katie Couric is about two and a half pounds of excrement"
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,633
    149
    If what those inks say is true and interviews were edited and John Lott was excluded then the episode deserves more then a 2.5 couric score.
    They don't think very highly of John Lott and crap canned his stuff claiming his data has been largely discredited even though they took the time to interview him for 4 hours.

    Then they go ahead and pull their selective editing garbage.
     

    VERT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Jan 4, 2009
    9,801
    113
    Seymour
    They don't think very highly of John Lott and crap canned his stuff claiming his data has been largely discredited even though they took the time to interview him for 4 hours.

    Then they go ahead and pull their selective editing garbage.

    :tantrum: :tinfoil:
     

    OakRiver

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 12, 2014
    15,013
    77
    IN
    Pardon my ignorance on the claims that John Lott was discredited, but what were the claims against his research and what were the counter points to the attempt to discredit/disprove him?
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,687
    77
    Camby area
    Pardon my ignorance on the claims that John Lott was discredited, but what were the claims against his research and what were the counter points to the attempt to discredit/disprove him?

    They dont need statistical proof, silly. Feelings are good enough for them.
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,374
    149
    Earth
    Top Bottom